Newly Posted Awards, Decisions & Materials

Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw portal. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.
18 Dec 2002
Franz Sedelmayer v. Russian Federation, SCC
View case details
Judgment of the City Court of Stockholm (German)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the City Court of Stockholm (German)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Sweden
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the City Court of Stockholm (German)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


7 Jul 1998
Franz Sedelmayer v. Russian Federation, SCC
View case details
Arbitration Award
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Arbitration Award
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Jan Peter Wachler
Respondent appointee
Ivan Zykin
Tribunal/Panel chair
Staffan Magnusson
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
P.P. Borodin, V.E. Savchenko, Alla V. Kchoroshilova, Galina M. Filatova
Respondent's counsel
Franz Sedelmayer v. The Russian Federation
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Arbitration Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


13 Jan 2004
S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL
View case details
Reasons for Order (Review by Federal Court of Canada)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Reasons for Order (Review by Federal Court of Canada)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Canada
Print reporter
Document Summary
Reasons for Order (Review by Federal Court of Canada)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


30 Dec 2002
S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL
View case details
Dissenting Opinion of Professor Bryan P. Schwartz (concerning the apportionment of costs between the Disputing Parties)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Dissenting Opinion of Professor Bryan P. Schwartz (concerning the apportionment of costs between the Disputing Parties)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Bryan Schwartz
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Dissenting Opinion of Professor Bryan P. Schwartz (concerning the apportionment of costs between the Disputing Parties)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


30 Dec 2002
S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL
View case details
Final Award (concerning the apportionment of costs between the Disputing Parties)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Final Award (concerning the apportionment of costs between the Disputing Parties)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Bryan Schwartz
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
J. Martin Hunter
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Final Award (concerning the apportionment of costs between the Disputing Parties)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


2 Dec 2002
S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL
View case details
Procedural Order No. 21 (concerning applications for correction and interpretation of the Tribunals Second Partial Award)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Procedural Order No. 21 (concerning applications for correction and interpretation of the Tribunals Second Partial Award)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Bryan Schwartz
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
J. Martin Hunter
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Procedural Order No. 21 (concerning applications for correction and interpretation of the Tribunals Second Partial Award)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


Pages