Participant Type:
Individual
Involved in 11 cases (10 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Contract (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 106 case documents on record
Arbitrator 2 cases in this role
- Utsch M.O.V.E.R.S. International GmbH, Erich Utsch Aktiengesellschaft, and Helmut Jungbluth v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/37 View case details
- WCV World Capital Ventures Cyprus Ltd. & Channel Crossings Ltd. v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2016-12 View case details
2 source documents
Counsel (Claimant side) 1 case in this role
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL View case details
49 source documents
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Application for Amicus Standing - Earth Justice
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Application for Amicus Standing - IISD
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Canada's Article 1128 Submission re NAFTA FTC Statement on Article 1105
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Canada's Fourth Submission per Article 1128
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Claimant's Notice of Challenge to Arbitrator Warren Christopher
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Disputing Parties' Agreement on Amicus Participation
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Final Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Merits
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Final Submission in Support of Application for Amicus Standing - IISD
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, First Submission on Amicus Application - U.S.A
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor's First Submission on Amicus Application
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor's Reply
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor's Response to the Application for Amicus Standing
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor’s First Submission re NAFTA FTC Statement on Article 1105 and Appendix: Witness Statement of Guillermo Aguilar Alvarez
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor’s Post Hearing Submission
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor’s Reply to USA Post Hearing Submission
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Investor’s Second Submission re NAFTA FTC Statement on Article 1105
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Letter from Tribunal (on nature and timing of next phase)
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Request for Interpretation of Award
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Request for Reconsideration of First Partial Award
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Request to Gather Additional Evidence
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Request to Limit Amicus Curiae Submissions to Legal Issues Raised
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Response to Supplemental Statement of Defense on Intent
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Mexico's Article 1128 Submission on Jurisdiction
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Mexico's Article 1128 Submission re FTC Statement on Article 1105
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Mexico's Fourth Submission per Article 1128
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, New Amicus Petition from IISD and Bluewater Network
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Notice of Arbitration,
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Order on Schedule for Next Phase
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Partial Award
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Procedural Order No. 1
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Reasons for the Tribunal's Decision on the Place of Arbitration
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Rejoinder of the U.S.A. to the Investor's Reply
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Response of Arbitrator Warren Christopher to Claimant's Notice of Challenge
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Statement of Claim
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Statement of Defence
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Supplemental Application for Amicus Standing - IISD
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Transcript of Jurisdictional Hearing
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Transcript of Procedural Hearing (Uncorrected)
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Amended Statement of Defense
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Letter on Nature and Timing of Next Phase
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility of Amended Claim
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Reply to Investor’s Post Hearing Submission
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Response to Methanex's Request to Limit Amicus Curiae Submissions
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Supplemental Statement of Defense on Intent
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, US First Submission re NAFTA FTA Statement on Article 1105
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, US Post Hearing Submission
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, US Request for a Hearing on the Fitness of the Re-Submitted Amended Statement of Claim
- Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, US Second Submission re NAFTA FTC Statement on Article 1105
Counsel (Respondent side) 8 cases in this role
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru (I), PCA Case No. 2020-11 View case details
6 source documents
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru, Claimant's Memorial
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru, Notice of Arbitration
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 1
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 2 (Request for Disclosure of Funding Agreement)
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru, Response to the Notice of Arbitration
- Bacilio Amorrortu v. Republic of Peru, Terms of Appointment
- Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. Ecuador (II), PCA Case No. 2009-23 View case details
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/18 View case details
8 source documents
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Award of the Tribunal
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Decision on Rectification of the Award
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 1
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 2
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 3
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 4
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 5
- Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. (Deviandes) v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 6
- European American Investment Bank AG v. Slovak Republic, PCA Case No. 2010-17 View case details
- Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SAS v. Republic of India, PCA Case No. 2014-26 View case details
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2012-10 View case details
31 source documents
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's First Request for Interim Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Memorial
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Reply Memorial
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Its Request for Interim Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission Regarding the 4 August 2016 NCJ Judgment
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission in Response to Ecuador's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission in Response to Ecuador's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission re Respondent's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission re Respondent's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission re Respondent's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Supplemental Reply Memorial
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Counter-Memorial
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Opposition to Claimant's Request for Interim Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Rejoinder (Spanish)
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Rejoinder in Opposition to Claimant's Application for Provisional Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Letter re the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador (Spanish)
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Letter re the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador (Spanish)
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Request for a New Decision Confirming the Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 4 August 2016 Judgment
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Submission re Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 2016 Judgment (Spanish)
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Notice of Arbitration
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Observations of Judge Schwebel
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Rejoinder
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Response re Claimant's Request for Interim Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Submission Regarding the 4 August 2016 NCJ Judgment
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Submission re Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 2016 Judgment
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Submission re Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 2016 Judgment
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Second Decision on Interim Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Tribunal's Letter re Request for Interim Measures Dated 12 June 2012
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Decision on Interim Measures
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Expert Opinion of Professor Steven R. Ratner
- Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Letter from Ecuador's General Prosecutor Transmitting the Decision to the National Court of Justice (Spanish)
- Murphy Exploration & Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2012-16 (formerly AA 434) View case details
3 source documents
- Murphy Exploration & Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, Decision on Respondent's Request for Bifurcation
- Murphy Exploration & Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, Partial Award on Jurisdiction
- Murphy Exploration & Production Company International v. Republic of Ecuador, Separate Opinion of Prof. Georges Abi-Saab
- Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. v. Republic of India, PCA Case No. 2017-37 View case details

