Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Its Request for Interim Measures

5 Aug 2012
Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2012-10
View case details
Claimant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Its Request for Interim Measures
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Claimant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Its Request for Interim Measures
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Bruno Simma
Tribunal/Panel chair
Franklin Berman
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Mary Bartkus, Gary B. Born, David W. Ogden, Rachael Kent, Charles Beene, Claudio Salas, WilmerHale
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Diego García Carrión, Blanca Gómez de la Torre, Christel Gaibor, Diana Teran, Paul S. Reichler, Mark A. Clodfelter, Ronald E. M. Goodman, Alberto Wray, Janis H. Brennan, Diana Tsutieva, Constantinos Salonidis, Foley Hoag
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Claimant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Its Request for Interim Measures
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.