Gary B. Born

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 14 cases (12 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 2 Contract (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 55 case documents on record

Arbitrator 8 cases in this role

• B-Mex, LLC and Others v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/16/3 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Annex to Procedural Order No. 19
  • Procedural Order No. 19
• Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22 View case details
  1 source document

  • Biwater Gauff v. Tanzania, Procedural Order No. 1
• Hanocal Holding B.V. and IPIC International B.V. v. Republic of Korea, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/17 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Hanocal Holding B.V. and IPIC International B.V. v. Republic of Korea, Press Release by Respondent's Counsel
  • Hanocal Holding B.V. and IPIC International B.V. v. Republic of Korea, Procedural Order No. 1 Concerning Procedural Matters
  • Hanocal Holding B.V. and IPIC International B.V. v. Republic of Korea, Procedural Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 44
• JSC Tashkent and others v. Kyrgyzstan, ARB(AF)/16/4 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Award - Partial Dissent of Zachary Douglas
  • Decision on Bifurcated Preliminary Objections - Partial Dissent of Zachary Douglas
  • Decision on Bircated Preliminary Objections
  • JSC Tashkent v. Kyrgyzstan, Award
  • Set Aside Application - US Court for the District of Columbia
• Juvel Ltd. and Bithell Holdings Ltd. v. Republic of Poland, ICC Case No. 19459/MHM  View case details
  2 source documents

  • Juvel Ltd. and Bithell Holdings Ltd. v. Republic of Poland, Final Award on Costs
  • Juvel Ltd. and Bithell Holdings Ltd. v. Republic of Poland, Partial Final Award
• Mathias Kruck and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/23 View case details
  1 source document

  • Mathias Kruck and others v. Kingdom of Spain, Decision on the Proposal to Disqualify Mr. Gary B. Born
• Steward Malta Limited, Steward Malta Management Limited and Steward Malta Assets Limited v. Republic of Malta, ICC Case No. 27684/ELU  View case details
  1 source document

  • Steward v. Malta, Final Award of the Tribunal
• Tekfen TML Joint Venture v Libya, ICC Case No. 21371/MCP/DDA View case details
  2 source documents

  • Award
  • Dissenting Opinion of Gary B. Born

Counsel (Claimant side) 2 cases in this role

• Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, PCA Case No. 2012-10 View case details
  32 source documents

  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's First Request for Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Memorial
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Reply Memorial
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Its Request for Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Second Request for Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission Regarding the 4 August 2016 NCJ Judgment
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission in Response to Ecuador's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission in Response to Ecuador's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission re Respondent's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission re Respondent's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Submission re Respondent's Challenge to Judge Schwebel
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Claimant's Supplemental Reply Memorial
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Counter-Memorial
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Opposition to Claimant's Request for Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Rejoinder (Spanish)
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Ecuador's Rejoinder in Opposition to Claimant's Application for Provisional Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Letter re the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador (Spanish)
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Letter re the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador (Spanish)
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Request for a New Decision Confirming the Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 4 August 2016 Judgment
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Merck's Submission re Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 2016 Judgment (Spanish)
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Notice of Arbitration
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Observations of Judge Schwebel
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Rejoinder
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Response re Claimant's Request for Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Submission Regarding the 4 August 2016 NCJ Judgment
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Submission re Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 2016 Judgment
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Respondent's Submission re Application of the Interim Measures Decision to the NCJ's 2016 Judgment
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Second Decision on Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Tribunal's Letter re Request for Interim Measures Dated 12 June 2012
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Decision on Interim Measures
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Expert Opinion of Professor Steven R. Ratner
  • Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Letter from Ecuador's General Prosecutor Transmitting the Decision to the National Court of Justice (Spanish)
• Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisenbank Austria d.d. v. Republic of Croatia (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/17/34 View case details
  1 source document

  • Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisenbank Austria d.d. v. Republic of Croatia, Decision on Respondent's Objections to Jurisdiction

Counsel (Respondent side) 1 case in this role

• Pearl Petroleum, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, LCIA Case No. 132527 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Pearl Petroleum Company, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum and Pearl Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, Memorandum of Correction
  • Pearl Petroleum Company, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum and Pearl Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, Memorandum of Correction of the Second Partial Final Award dated 27 November 2015
  • Pearl Petroleum Company, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum and Pearl Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, Partial Final Award
  • Pearl Petroleum Company, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum and Pearl Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, Second Partial Final Award
  • Pearl Petroleum Company, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum and Pearl Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, Third Partial Final Award

Legal Expert 1 case in this role

• CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd., Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, and Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited v. Republic of India (I), PCA Case No. 2013-09  View case detailsCase-profile record

Other participation (role not yet classified) 2 cases in this role

• Freeport-McMoRan Inc. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/08 View case detailsCase-profile record
• InfraRed Environmental Infrastructure GP Limited and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/12, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/12 View case detailsCase-profile record