Zachary Douglas

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 60 cases (53 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 4 Contract (Investor–State) · 2 Foreign Investment Law (Investor–State) · 1 Investment Protection Disputes · 1 International Commercial Arbitration (State–Private)) · evidenced by 470 case documents on record

Tribunal Chair / President 3 cases in this role

• Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, ICSID Case No. ARB/19/20 View case details
  9 source documents

  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Decision on Request for Suspension of Proceedings and on Request for Provisional Measures
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Decision on the Claimants’ Proposal to Disqualify Zachary Douglas and Mr. V.V. Veeder
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Decision on the Request for Joinder of a Third Party
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Order of the Tribunal Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Procedural Order No. 1 – Annex A
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Ayat Nizar Raja Sumrain and others v. State of Kuwait, Procedural Order No. 4
• Emergofin B.V. and Velbay Holdings Ltd. v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/35 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Emergofin and Velbay v. Ukraine, Award, May 1, 2026
  • Emergofin and Velbay v. Ukraine, Decision on Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Liability
• Société Resort Company Invest Abidjan, Stanislas Citerici and Gérard Bot v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/11 View case details
  1 source document

  • Société Resort Company Invest Abidjan, Stanislas Citerici and Gérard Bot v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, Decision on the Respondent’s Preliminary Objection to Jurisdiction

Sole Arbitrator 1 case in this role

• DP World Djibouti FZCO and Doraleh Container Terminal SA v. Republic of Djibouti (II), LCIA Case No. 183886 View case details
  2 source documents

  • DP World and Doraleh v. Djibouti, Procedural Order No. 1 (Mode of Communications), February 28, 2018
  • DP World and Doraleh v. Djibouti, Third Partial Final Award, January 20, 2022

Arbitrator 49 cases in this role

• AVAX S.A. v. Lebanese Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/29 View case details
  1 source document

  • AVAX S.A. v. Lebanese Republic, Award
• Accession Mezzanine Capital L.P. and Danubius Kereskedöház Vagyonkezelö Zrt. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/3 View case details
  1 source document

  • Accession Mezzanine Capital L.P. and Danubius Kereskedöház Vagyonkezelö Zrt. v. Hungary, Award
• Ahron G. Frenkel v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/49 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Ahron G. Frenkel v. Republic of Croatia, Award
  • Ahron G. Frenkel v. Republic of Croatia, Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Stanimir Alexandrov
• BM Mühendislik ve İnşaat A.Ş. v. United Arab Emirates, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/20 View case details
  2 source documents

  • BM Mühendislik ve İnşaat A.Ş. v. United Arab Emirates, Award
  • BM Mühendislik ve İnşaat A.Ş. v. United Arab Emirates, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Charles N. Brower
• Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/30 View case details
  13 source documents

  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Claimant’s Observations on the Respondent’s Preliminary Objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Claimant’s Rejoinder on Preliminary Objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Respondent’s Preliminary Objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Respondent’s Reply on Preliminary Objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Claimant’s Rejoinder on Preliminary Objections pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 41
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Decision on Respondent's Rule 41 Application
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Respondent’s Counter-Memorial
  • Bank of Nova Scotia v. Republic of Peru, Respondent’s Reply on Preliminary Objections pursuant to ICSID A-rbitration Rule 41
• Bedri Selmani v. Republic of Kosovo, ICC Case No. 24443/MHM/HBH View case details
  1 source document

  • Award
• Beijing Urban Construction Group Co. Ltd. v. Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/30 View case details
  1 source document

  • Beijing Urban Construction Group Co. Ltd. v. Republic of Yemen, Decision on Jurisdiction
• Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, PCA Case No. 2024-03 View case details
  6 source documents

  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Notice of Arbitration
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, PCA Press Release (I)
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 5
• Champion Holding Company and others v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/2 View case details
  1 source document

  • Champion Holding Company and others v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Final Award
• Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/14 View case details
  10 source documents

  • Claimant's Memorial
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Claimant's Reply Memorial
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Claimants' Rejoinder on Objections to Jurisdiction, Admissibility, or Competence
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Rejoinder on Objections to Jurisdiction, Admissibility, or Competence
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Respondent's Counter-Memorial
• Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB/23/33 View case details
  14 source documents

  • Claimants' Rejoinder on Jurisdiction
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Article 1128 Submission of Canada
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Article 1128 Submission of the United States of America
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Notice of Intent
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Reply on Jurisdiction
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States, Request for Arbitration
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management v. United Mexican States,Procedural Order No. 4
  • Cyrus Capital Partners, L.P. and Contrarian Capital Management, LLC v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 1
• Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/43 View case details
  9 source documents

  • Daniel Kappes and Kappes Cassiday & Associates v Guatemala, Notice of Arbitration
  • Daniel Kappes and Kappes Cassiday & Associates v Guatemala, Preliminary Objections of Guatemala
  • Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, La Puya's Request for Amicus Curiae Submission
  • Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, Procedural Order No. 3 (Hearing Protocol)
  • Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, Decision on the Respondent's Preliminary Objection
  • Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, Partial Dissenting Opinion of Zachary Douglas
  • Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala, Petition for Amicus Participation
  • Procedural Order No. 2 (On Amici Curiae Application for Leave to File Non-Disputing Party Submissions)
• Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp. v. Republic of Armenia, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/36 View case details
  6 source documents

  • Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp. v. Republic of Armenia, Award (excerpts)
  • Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp. v. Republic of Armenia, Procedural Order No. 2 (Decision on Application to Remove Counsel)
  • Edmond Khudyan and Arin Capital & Investment Corp. v. Republic of Armenia, Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on Respondent's Request for Bifurcation)
  • Khudyan and Arin Capital v. Armenia, Applicant’s Reply on the Continuation of the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
  • Khudyan and Arin Capital v. Armenia, Armenia’s Rejoinder to Claimant’s Application for Stay of Enforcement of the Award
  • Khudyan and Arin Capital v. Armenia, Opposition to Claimant’s Application for Stay of Enforcement of the Award
• Eni International B.V., Eni Oil Holdings B.V. and Nigerian Agip Exploration Limited v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/41 View case details
  1 source document

  • Procedural Order No. 4 on Amicus Participation
• Erhas and others v. Turkmenistan, UNCITRAL View case details
  1 source document

  • Erhas and others v. Turkmenistan, Notice of Arbitration, February 2013 (not public, see IAReporter story)
• Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, SCC Case No. V2018/098 View case details
  8 source documents

  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, Award
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, Correction and Interpretation of Award and Additional Award
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, European Commission's Amicus Curiae Brief
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, European Commission's Amicus Curiae Brief
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, European Commission's Application for Leave to Intervene as Non-Disputing Party
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, European Commission's Application for Leave to intervene as Non-Disputing Party
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, Procedural Order No 1
  • Festorino Invest Limited and others v Poland, Respondent Statement of Costs
• Fábrica de Vidrios Los Andes, C.A. and Owens-Illinois de Venezuela, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/21 View case details
  4 source documents

  • Fábrica de Vidrios Los Andes, C.A. and Owens-Illinois de Venezuela, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Award
  • Fábrica de Vidrios Los Andes, C.A. and Owens-Illinois de Venezuela, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on the Third Proposal to Disqualify Arbitrator L. Yves Fortier, Q.C.
  • Fábrica de Vidrios Los Andes, C.A. and Owens-Illinois de Venezuela, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,Decision on the Proposal to Disqualify L. Yves Fortier, Q.C., Arbitrator
  • Fábrica de Vidrios Los Andes, C.A. and Owens-Illinois de Venezuela, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,Reasoned Decision on the Proposal for Disqualification of Arbitrator L. Yves Fortier, Q.C.
• Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31 View case details
  102 source documents

  • Annex A to Procedural Order No. 14
  • Claimants’ Observations on the non-disputing parties’ application
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania (I), Procedural Order No. 1
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Award of the Tribunal
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' First Request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' Memorial
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' Observations on New Evidence
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' Reply to the Respondent's observations on the First Request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' Response to Questions Presented by the Tribunal in PO no. 27
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' Second Post-Hearing Brief
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants' Surrejoinder on New Jurisdictional Objection
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants’ Comments on the Non-Disputing Parties’ Submission
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants’ Post Hearing Brief
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants’ Reply and Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants’ Reply to Respondent’s Observations on Claimants’ Second Request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Claimants’ Second Request for Provisional Measures and Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Decision on Claimants’ Second Request for Provisional Measures of November
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing Transcript Redacted
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 1
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 2
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 4
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 5
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 6
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 7
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Horacio A. Grigera Naon's Note of Dissent
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No 4
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 10
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 10 - Annex A
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 10 - Annex B
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 11
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 12
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 12 – Annex B
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 12 – Annex C
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 13
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 13 - Annex A
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 14
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 15
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 15 - Annex A
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 16
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 16 – Annex A
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 17
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 18
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 19
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 20
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 21
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 22
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 23
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 24
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 25
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 26
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 27
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 28
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 29
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 30
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 31
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 32
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 33
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 34
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 35
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 7
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 7 - Annex A
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 8
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 8 - Annex A
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 9
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Request for Arbitration
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent's Counter-Memorial
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent's Rejoinder
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent's further observations on the Claimants' First Request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent's observations on the Claimants' first request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondents Comments on Claimants Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent’s Additional Preliminary Objections
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent’s Comments on the Non-Disputing Parties’ Submission
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent’s Observations on Claimants’ Second Request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent’s Observations on New Evidence
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent’s Rejoinder to Claimants’ Second Request for Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Respondent’s Second Post Hearing Brief
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 1
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 10
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 11
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 2
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 3
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 5
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 6
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 7
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 8
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Transcripts Hearing Day 9
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Tribunals Reasoned Decision on Claimants Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Tribunal’s Decision on the Claimants’ Request for Emergency Temporary Provisional Measures
  • Hearing on the Merits and Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 3
  • Procedural Order No. 12 – Annex A
  • Procedural Order No. 36
  • Replies on the Non-Disputing Parties' Application
  • Respondent’s Observations on the non-disputing parties’ application
  • Respondent’s Post Hearing Brief
  • Respondent’s Reply on the non-disputing parties’ application
  • Respondent’s Response to Claimants’ Answers to the Tribunal’s Questions in PO No. 27
  • Transcripts Hearing Day 4
• Gardabani Holdings B.V. and Silk Road Holdings B.V. v. Georgia, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/29 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Award
  • Dissenting Opinion by Zachary Douglas
  • Final Award
• Gardabani Holdings B.V., Inter RAO UES PJSC, Telasi JSC v. Government of Georgia, Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Georgia, State Service Bureau Ltd, SCC Case No. V2018/039 and ICSID Case No. ADM/18/1 View case details
  4 source documents

  • Final Award (redacted)
  • Partial Award
  • Partial Dissenting Opinion of Zachary Douglas QC
  • Second Partial Award on Damages
• Görkem Inşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/30 View case details
  1 source document

  • Görkem Inşaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding
• Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/2 View case details
  8 source documents

  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 7
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Kingdom of Sweden, Procedural Order No. 8
• Indorama International Finance Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/32 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Indorama International Finance Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Notice of Arbitration (not public, see IAReporter story)
  • Indorama International Finance Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Procedural Order
  • Indorama International Finance Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Procedural order taking note of the discontinuance of the proceeding under to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1)
• Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/9  View case details
  17 source documents

  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Award
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Claimant's Application for Provisional Measures and Temporary Relief
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Claimant's Letter re Submission of the United States of America
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Claimant's Reply Memorial
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Claimant's Reply in Further Support of Its Application for Provisional Measures and Temporary Relief
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Claimants' Memorial
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Decision on Claimant's Application for Provisional Measures and Temporary Relief
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Presentation of Uruguay
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on Claimant’s Document Production Request)
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Procedural Order No. 4 (Decision on Respondent’s Document Production Request)
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Procedural Order No.1
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Rejoinder of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Submission of the United States of America
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Uruguay's Comments on the Submission of the United States of America
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Uruguay's Counter-Memorial
  • Italba Corporation v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, Uruguay's Response to Claimant's Reply in Further Support of Its Application for Provisional Measures and Temporary Relief
• JSC Tashkent and others v. Kyrgyzstan, ARB(AF)/16/4 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Award - Partial Dissent of Zachary Douglas
  • Decision on Bifurcated Preliminary Objections - Partial Dissent of Zachary Douglas
  • Decision on Bircated Preliminary Objections
  • JSC Tashkent v. Kyrgyzstan, Award
  • Set Aside Application - US Court for the District of Columbia
• KGL International for Ports, Warehousing, and Transport K.S.C.C. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/21/21 View case details
  2 source documents

  • KGL v. Egypt, Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1)
  • KGL v. Egypt, Registration of the Request for Arbitration
• Khemisset UK Limited and Potasse de Khemisset S.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/22 View case details
  1 source document

  • Khemisset UK Limited and Potasse de Khemisset S.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, Registration of the Request for Arbitration
• Koch Minerals Sàrl and Koch Nitrogen International Sàrl v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/19 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Koch Minerals Sàrl and Koch Nitrogen International Sàrl v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Partial Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Zachary Douglas
  • Koch Minerals Sàrl and Koch Nitrogen International Sàrl v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Award
  • Opinion - US Court of Appeal
• Mathias Kruck and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/23 View case details
  7 source documents

  • italaw180997 - Kruck and others v. Spain, Complaint against Spain, June 22, 2026
  • Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Principles of Damages
  • Kruck and others v. Spain, Award
  • Mathias Kruck and others v. Kingdom of Spain, Decision on the Proposal to Disqualify Mr. Gary B. Born
  • Mathias Kruck and others v. Spain, Partial Dissenting Opinion by Zachary Douglas
  • italaw180994 - Kruck and others v. Spain, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, April 19, 2021
  • italaw180995 - Kruck and others v. Spain, Decision Dismissing the Respondent's Request for Reconsideration of the Tribunal's Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, December 6, 2021
• Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3 View case details
  32 source documents

  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Article 1128 Submission of the United States of America
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Award
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Claimant’s Observations to Respondent’s Reply of June 4, 2018
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Claimant’s Request for Supplementary Decision
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Claimant’s Response to Article 1128 Submissions
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Confidentiality Order
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Government of Canada Reply to 1128 Submission
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Government of Canada’s Post-Hearing Submission
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 1
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 2
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 3
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 4
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 5
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 6
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 7
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Hearing Transcripts - Day 8
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Mercer International Inc.’s Post-Hearing Submission
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 10
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 11
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 11
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 7
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 8
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 9
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Respondent’s Reply to Claimant’s Request for Supplementary Decision
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Respondent’s Response to Claimant’s Observations of June 25, 2018
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Submission of Mexico Pursuant [to] Article 1128 of NAFTA
  • Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, Tribunal’s Decision on Claimant’s Request for Supplementary Decision
• Mimoza Ndroqi v. Republic of Albania, PCA Case No. 2023-64 View case details
  1 source document

  • Mimoza Ndroqi v. Republic of Albania, Commencement of Proceeding
• Misen Energy AB (publ) and Misen Enterprises AB v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/21/15 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Misen Energy AB (publ) and Misen Enterprises AB v. Ukraine, Misen's Press release
  • Misen Energy AB (publ) and Misen Enterprises AB v. Ukraine, Misen's Press release
• NiQuan Energy LLC and NiQuan Energy Trinidad Limited v. Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, ICSID Case No. ARB/24/17 View case details
  2 source documents

  • NiQuan Energy LLC and NiQuan Energy Trinidad Limited v. Republic of Trinidad and Tobago,Procedural Order No. 1
  • NiQuan Energy LLC and NiQuan Energy Trinidad Limited v. Republic of Trinidad and Tobago,Procedural Order No. 3 on the Respondent’s Request for Security for Costs
• Oleg Deripaska v. Republic of Montenegro, PCA Case No. 2017-07 View case details
  1 source document

  • Oleg Deripaska v. Republic of Montenegro, Final Award
• Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/42 View case details
  11 source documents

  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Award
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Claimant's Waiver
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Claimants' Letter to ICSID
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Notice of Dispute under the 1982 US-Panama BIT
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Notice of Intent to Submit Claims to Arbitration under the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Procedural Order No.1
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Request for Arbitration
  • Omega Engineering LLC and Oscar Rivera v. Republic of Panama, Submission of the United States of America
• Orange SA v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/10 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Orange SA v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Procedural Order No. 1 Concerning Procedural Matters
  • Orange SA v. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Procedural Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(1)
• Park Avenue Capital LLC v. Republic of Moldova, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/25 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Park Avenue Capital LLC v. Republic of Moldova, Registration of the Request for Arbitration
  • Park Avenue v. Moldova, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Park Avenue v. Moldova, Procedural Order No. 2
• Rizzani de Eccher S.p.A., Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. and Trevi S.p.A. v. State of Kuwait, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/8 View case details
  1 source document

  • Rizzani de Eccher S.p.A., Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. and Trevi S.p.A. v. State of Kuwait, Decision on Provisional Measures
• Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/23/5 View case details
  29 source documents

  • Claimant's Memorial on Jurisdiction and the Merits
  • Claimant's Observations on the Government of Québec's Request for Leave to File a Written Submission as a Non-Disputing Party
  • Procedural Order No. 1
  • Procedural Order No. 2
  • Request for Leave to File a Written Submission as a Non-Disputing Party
  • Respondent's Request for Bifurcation
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada,
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Claimant's Rejoinder on Respondent's Request for Bifurcation
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Claimant’s Rejoinder on Jurisdiction
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Letter from the Secretariat
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Observations on Request for Suspension of the Proceedings
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 1 - Annex B - Procedural Timetable
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 10
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 11
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 12
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on the Respondent’s Request for Suspension of the Proceedingand Other Requests)
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 6 (Decision on Québec’s Application for Leave to Intervene as Non-Disputing Party)
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 7 (Decision on Centre quebécois du droit de l’environnement’s Application for Leave to Intervene)
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Procedural Order No. 9
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Request for Suspension of the Proceeding (French)
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Respondent's Counter-Memorial on the Merits
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Respondent's Reply on Jurisdiction
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Respondent’s Counter-Memorial
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada, Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits
  • Ruby River Capital LLC v. Canada,Claimant’s Reply
  • Ruby v. Canada, Claimant's Post-hearing Brief, March 24, 2026
  • Ruby v. Canada, Respondent's Post-hearing Brief, March 24, 2026
• SECE İnşaat ve Ticaret A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/34 View case details
  3 source documents

  • SECE İnşaat ve Ticaret A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, Order Taking Note of Discontinuance of Proceedings
  • SECE İnşaat ve Ticaret A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, Procedural Order No. 1
  • SECE İnşaat ve Ticaret A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, Procedural Order No. 2
• Scholz Holding v. Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/19/2 View case details
  7 source documents

  • Award
  • Decision on Jurisdiction
  • Procedural Order No. 1
  • Procedural Order No. 2
  • Procedural Order No. 3
  • Procedural Order No. 4
  • Procedural Order No. 5
• Slovak Gas Holding BV, GDF International SAS and E.ON Ruhrgas International GmbH v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/7 View case details
  1 source document

  • Slovak Gas Holding BV, GDF International SAS and E.ON Ruhrgas International GmbH v. Slovak Republic, Award Embodying Settlement Agreement
• Smart Energy B.V. and PJSC Ukrgazvydobutok v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/38 View case details
  4 source documents

  • italaw180968 - Smart Energy and Ukrgazvydobutok v. Ukraine, Procedural Order No. 1 (redacted), March 4, 2026
  • italaw180969 - Smart Energy and Ukrgazvydobutok v. Ukraine, Procedural Order No. 2 on Transparency and Confidentiality, March 4, 2026.pdf
  • italaw180970 - Smart Energy and Ukrgazvydobutok v. Ukraine, Decision on Claimants' Application for Provisional Measures, May 7, 2026
  • italaw180971 - Smart Energy and Ukrgazvydobutok v. Ukraine, Decision on Interim Relief Application, February 16, 2026
• Smurfit Holdings B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/49 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Smurfit Holdings B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Concurring Opinion of Elliot Polebaum
  • Smurfit Holdings B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Respondent’s Request to Address the Objections to Jurisdiction as a Preliminary Question
  • Smurfit Holdings B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Dissenting Opinion of Howard Mann
  • Smurfit Holdings B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Final Award
  • Tribunal Decision Declaring the Proceeding Closed in Accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 38(1)
• Stadtwerke München GmbH, RWE Innogy GmbH, and others v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/1 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Stadtwerke München GmbH, RWE Innogy GmbH, and others v. Kingdom of Spain, Award
  • Stadtwerke München GmbH, RWE Innogy GmbH, and others v. Kingdom of Spain,Dissenting Opinion of Professor Kaj Hobér
• Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/20 View case details
  16 source documents

  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Award
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 10
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 11
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 12
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 13
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 14
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 7
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 8
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited, Procedural Order No. 9
• Suomi Power Networks TopCo B.V., Supernova II Bidco BV and AMF Tjänstepension AB v. Republic of Finland, ICSID Case No. ARB/24/37 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Suomi Power Networks TopCo B.V., Supernova II Bidco BV and AMF Tjänstepension AB v. Republic of Finland,
  • Suomi Power Networks TopCo B.V., Supernova II Bidco BV and AMF Tjänstepension AB v. Republic of Finland, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Suomi Power Networks TopCo B.V., Supernova II Bidco BV and AMF Tjänstepension AB v. Republic of Finland,Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on the Respondent’s Request for Bifurcation)
• Veolia Propreté v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/15 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Award
  • Decision on Jurisdiction
  • Veolia Propreté v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Notice of Arbitration (not public, see IAReporter story)
• Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Canada (II), ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3 View case details
  25 source documents

  • Confidentiality Order
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Appendix A to Claimant’s Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada's Reply to Claimant's Response to Request for Bifurcation
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada's Response to the Article 1128 Submission
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada's Submission on Costs
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada’s Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada’s Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant's Response to Canada's Request for Bifurcation
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant's Response to the Article 1128 Submission
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant's Submission on Costs
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant’s Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant’s Rejoinder to Canada’s Reply in Support of its Request for Bifurcation
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Expert Report of Jan Paulsson
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Expert Report of Kathryn A. Coleman
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Final Award
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Hearing on Bifurcation Transcript
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction Transcript - Day 1
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction Transcript - Day 2
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Mexico's NAFTA Article 1128 Submission
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 2 - Hearing Protocol
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 3 - Decision on Bifurcation
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Request for Bifurcation
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Kathryn A. Coleman
  • Westmoreland Mining Holdings, LLC v. Government of Canada, Statement of Defence

Counsel (Claimant side) 1 case in this role

• Pearl Petroleum, Dana Gas PJSC & Crescent Petroleum v. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, LCIA Case No. 132527 View case details
  1 source document

  • Dana Gas, Crescent Petroleum and Pearl Petroleum v The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq, Decision of the UK High Court of Justice on the State Immunity of the Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq

Counsel (Respondent side) 4 cases in this role

• Antaris Solar GmbH and Dr. Michael Göde v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-01 View case details
  1 source document

  • Antaris Solar GmbH and others v. Czech Repulic, Award, Dissenting Opinion of Gary Born, Declaration of Judge Tomka
• Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 View case details
  1 source document

  • Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic
• Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. Ecuador (II), PCA Case No. 2009-23 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, Second Partial Award on Track II
  • Chevron v. Ecuador (II), Note of Partial Dissent by Dr. Horacio Grigera Naon
  • Chevron v. Ecuador (II), Fourth Partial Award on Track III
• European Media Ventures SA v. The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL View case details
  2 source documents

  • European Media Ventures SA v. The Czech Republic, Award on Jurisdiction
  • European Media Ventures SA v. The Czech Republic, Partial Award on Liability

Other participation (role not yet classified) 2 cases in this role

• CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd., Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, and Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited v. Republic of India (I), PCA Case No. 2013-09  View case detailsCase-profile record
• Doups Holdings LLC v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/24 View case detailsCase-profile record