W. Michael Reisman

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 12 cases (11 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Foreign Investment Law (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 71 case documents on record

Tribunal Chair / President 2 cases in this role

• Branimir Mensik v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/9 View case details
  1 source document

  • Branimir Mensik v. Slovak Republic, Order for the Discontinuance of the Proceeding for Lack of Payment of Advances
• Everest Estate LLC et al. v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. 2015-36 View case details
  6 source documents

  • Everest Estate LLC et al. v. Russian Federation, Award on the Merits
  • Everest Estate LLC et al. v. Russian Federation, Decision on Jurisdiction
  • Everest Estate LLC et al. v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release on Award on the Merits
  • Everest Estate LLC et al. v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release on the Hearing on the Merits
  • Everest Estate LLC et al. v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release on the Questions Posed to the Parties with Respect to Issues of Jurisdiction and Admissibility and Ukraine's Non-Disputing Party Submission
  • Everest Estate LLC et al. v. The Russian Federation, Press Release on the Commencement of Arbitration

Arbitrator 9 cases in this role

• Gami Investments Inc. v. Mexico, UNCITRAL View case details
  1 source document

  • Gami Investments Inc. v. Mexico, Procedural Order No. 4
• JKX Oil & Gas plc, Poltava Gas B.V. and Poltava Petroleum Company JV v. Ukraine View case details
  1 source document

  • JKX OIL & GAS PLC, Poltava Gas B.V. and Poltava Petroleum Company JV v. Ukraine, Award
• Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL View case details
  21 source documents

  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Amicus Submission by Bluewater Network and Others
  • Methanex's Reply on Authority to Reconsider First Partial Award
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Final Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Merits
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Eight
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Five
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Four
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Nine
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Seven
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Six
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Three
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Hearing Transcript-Day Two
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Letter from Tribunal (on nature and timing of next phase)
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Letter on Amicus Applications
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Request to Limit Amicus Curiae Submissions to Legal Issues Raised
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Methanex's Submission on Costs
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Mexico's Fourth Submission per Article 1128
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Order on Schedule for Next Phase
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, Second Amended Statement of Claim
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Amended Statement of Defense
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, U.S. Response to Methanex's Request to Limit Amicus Curiae Submissions
  • Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, US Request for a Hearing on the Fitness of the Re-Submitted Amended Statement of Claim
• Misen Energy AB (publ) and Misen Enterprises AB v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/21/15 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Misen Energy AB (publ) and Misen Enterprises AB v. Ukraine, Misen's Press release
  • Misen Energy AB (publ) and Misen Enterprises AB v. Ukraine, Misen's Press release
• Mobile TeleSystems OJSC v. Republic of Uzbekistan, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/7 View case details
  1 source document

  • Mobile TeleSystems OJSC v. Republic of Uzbekistan, Procedural Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding Pursuant to Article 49(1) of the Arbitration (Additional Facility) Rules
• Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), PCA Case No. 2012-07 View case details
  12 source documents

  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Claimant's Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Claimant's Statement of Claim
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Claimant's Supplementary Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Email from Claimant Regarding Bifurcation Application
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Procedural Order No 1
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Procedural Order No. 3
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Respondent's Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Respondent's Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt (I), Respondent's Request for Bifurcation
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt, Final Award
  • Mohamed Abdel Raouf Bahgat v. Egypt, Judgment of Hague District Court
• PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. UNCT/18/5 View case details
  17 source documents

  • Award (Spanish)
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Award
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Claimant's Reply
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Professor W. Michael Reisman
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Professor W. Michael Reisman
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Counter-Memorial
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Counter-Memorial Errata
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Decision on Claimant Application for Additional Award and on the Applicable Rate
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Redacted Procedural Order No. 6
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 1
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 1 (revised)
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 2
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 3
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 4
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 5
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Rejoinder on the Merits
  • PACC Offshore Services Holdings v United Mexican States, Statement of Claim
• Peter A. Allard v. The Government of Barbados, PCA Case No. 2012-06 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Peter A. Allard v. The Government of Barbados, Award
  • Peter A. Allard v. The Government of Barbados, Award on Jurisdiction
  • Peter A. Allard v. The Government of Barbados, Declaration by Professor Reisman
• Yosef Maiman, Merhav (MNF), Merhav-Ampal Group, Merhav-Ampal Energy Holdings v. Arab Republic of Egypt, PCA Case No. 2012-26 View case details
  1 source document

  • Yosef Maiman, Merhav (MNF), Merhav-Ampal Group, Merhav-Ampal Energy Holdings v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility

Counsel (Respondent side) 1 case in this role

• Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/16 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Award
  • Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Disqualification of All Members of the Tribunal
  • Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Disqualification of Tribunal Expert (Spanish)
  • Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Suspension of the Stay of Enforcement
  • Mobil Exploration and Development Inc. Suc. Argentina and Mobil Argentina S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Dissenting Opinion of Antonio Remiro Brotóns