Participant Type:
Law Firm
Involved in 8 cases (6 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Foreign Investment Law (Investor–State) · 1 Investment Protection Disputes) · evidenced by 27 case documents on record
Claimant's Law Firm 7 cases in this role
- Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania [I], ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20 View case details
- Libyan Arab Foreign Investment Company v. Kingdom of Belgium (II), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/25/5 View case details
- Mikhail Maratovich Fridman v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, PCA Case No. 2026-30 View case details
1 source document
- Patel Engineering Limited (India) v. Republic of Mozambique, PCA Case 2020-21 View case details
3 source documents
- Patel Engineering Limited (India) v. Republic of Mozambique, Decision on the Request for Correction of the Final Award
- Patel Engineering Limited (India) v. Republic of Mozambique, Final Award
- Patel Engineering Limited (India) v. Republic of Mozambique, Respondent's Response to the Request for Correction
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/11 View case details
11 source documents
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Procedural Order No. 3
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Claimants' Observations on Security for Costs
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Kingdom of Norway’s observations on document production
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Norway's Application for Security for Costs
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star’s request for document production
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Procedural Order No. 1
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Procedural Order No. 1
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway, Procedural Order No. 2 (Decision on the Respondent’s Request for Security for Cost)
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway,Decision on Stay of Enforcement
- Peteris Pildegovics and SIA North Star v. Kingdom of Norway,Procedural Order No. 4
- Pildegovics and North Star v. Norway, Norway’s Rejoinder on Annulment, Aug 26, 2025
- World Wide Minerals v. Republic of Kazakhstan (II), UNCITRAL View case details
- World Wide Minerals v. Republic of Kazakhstan (I), UNCITRAL View case details
Respondent's Law Firm 1 case in this role
- ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, ICSID Case No. ARB/24/44 View case details
5 source documents
- ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Procedural Order No. 1
- ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Procedural Order No. 2
- ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on the Claimant’s First Application for Provisional Measures)
- ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical BV v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Procedural Order No. 4 (Decision on the Claimant’s Request for Interim Provisional Relief)
- ExxonMobil v. Netherlands, Procedural Order No. 5 (Decision on Claimant's Second Application for Provisional Measures), Dec 24, 2025

