Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Diag Human SE and Mr. Josef Stava v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2018-20

New
Short Name:

Diag Human and Mr. Josef Stava v. Czechia

Case Type:
International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)
Applicable Procedural Rules:
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2013)
Applicable Treaty:
Czechia-Switzerland BIT (1990)
Applicable Legal Instruments:
Switzerland - Czech Republic BIT (1990) (English), Switzerland - Czech Republic BIT (1990) (French)
Economic Sector:
Manufacturing
Outcome:
In Favour of Claimant(s)
Amount of Damages:
US $352,000,000
See case mapped on Investor-State LawGuide

Available documents

23 Feb 2018
Czech-Arnold & Porter Agreement of Legal Representation
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Czech-Arnold & Porter Agreement of Legal Representation
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Czech-Arnold & Porter Agreement of Legal Representation
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


18 May 2022
Award
Document Details:
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


29 Jul 2022
Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales
Document provided by: Jus Mundi
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Joanna Mary Foster, Simon Brown
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Country in which this occurs:
United Kingdom
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


7 Jul 2023
Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales No. 2
Document provided by: Investor State Law Guide
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales No. 2
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Claimant appointee:
Daniel M. Price
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Rolf Knieper
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Bernard Hanotiau
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales No. 2
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


4 Oct 2023
Judgement of the UK Court of Appeal
Document provided by: IAReporter
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgement of the UK Court of Appeal
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Newey, Jeremy Hugh Stuart-Smith, Geraldine Mary Andrews
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgement of the UK Court of Appeal
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


21 Dec 2023
Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales No. 3
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales No. 3
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Stephen Martin Males, Richard Snowden, Sarah Valerie Falk
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgement of the High Court of England and Wales No. 3
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


8 Mar 2024
Judgement of the UK High Court No. 4
Document provided by: IAReporter
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgement of the UK High Court No. 4
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
David Foxton
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgement of the UK High Court No. 4
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


27 Mar 2024
Judgement of the England High Court of Justice
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgement of the England High Court of Justice
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
David Foxton
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgement of the England High Court of Justice
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


9 Aug 2024
Judgment of the UK High Court of Justice
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the UK High Court of Justice
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Verdirame, Philip Riches, Kate Parlett, Jonathan Ketcheson, Sam Goodman, Isabelle Winstanley, Mishcon de Reya
Respondent's counsel
Graham Dunning, Lucas Bastin, Peter Webster, Richard Hoyle, Katherine Ratcliffe, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Country in which this occurs:
United Kingdom
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgment of the UK High Court of Justice
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


7 May 2025
Judgment of the UK Court of Appeal
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the UK Court of Appeal
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Popplewell, Geraldine Mary Andrews
Claimant's counsel
Verdirame, Philip Riches, Kate Parlett, Jonathan Ketcheson, Sam Goodman, Isabelle Winstanley, Mishcon de Reya
Respondent's counsel
Graham Dunning, Lucas Bastin, Peter Webster, Richard Hoyle, Katherine Ratcliffe, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Country in which this occurs:
United Kingdom
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Judgment of the UK Court of Appeal
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.