Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Central European Aluminium Company (CEAC ) and En+ Group v. Montenegro, UNCITRAL, PCA

New
Short Name:

Case Type:
Contract (Investor–State)
Applicable Procedural Rules:
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976)
Seat of Arbitration:
Applicable Treaty:
Applicable Legal Instruments:
Economic Sector:
Mining and Quarrying, Including Hydrocarbons (oil and Gas)
Outcome:
In Favour of Respondent(s)

Available documents

13 Jan 2017
Award (See IA Reporter's Story)
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.