Daniel Bethlehem

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 16 cases (15 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Investment Protection Disputes) · evidenced by 213 case documents on record

Tribunal Chair / President 6 cases in this role

• Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. UNCT/13/2  View case details
  21 source documents

  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants Letter to Tribunal re Set Aside Proceedings - Annex I
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants' Emergency Motion for a Preliminary Injunction Staying the Arbitration Proceedings
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants' Letter re Factual Error or Omission in the Interim Award and Termination of the Case
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants' Letter re U.S. Court Proceeding
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Letter re Factual Error or Omission in the Interim Award and Termination of the Case
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Interim Award of the Tribunal (Corrected)
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Letter from Respondent to ICSID re U.S. Court Proceeding
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Letter to the parties from ICSID re U.S. Court Proceeding
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Procedural Order on Correction of the Interim Award and Termination of the Proceedings
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz (formerly Spence International Investments and others) v. Republic of Costa Rica, Respondent's Letter re Factual Error or Omission in the Interim Award and Termination of the Case
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants Letter to Tribunal re Corrections
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants Letter to Tribunal re Set Aside Proceedings
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Claimants Letter to Tribunal re Termination of Proceedings
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Procedural Order on Stay Application
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Respondent Letter to Tribunal re Corrections
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Respondent Letter to Tribunal re Termination of Proceedings
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica, Second ICSID Letter to the Parties re Publication on ICSID’s Website of Certain Documents
  • Aaron C. Berkowitz, Brett E. Berkowitz and Trevor B. Berkowitz v. Republic of Costa Rica,Respondent Letter to Tribunal re Suspension of Proceedings
  • Procedural Order Taking note of Termination
  • Spence International Investments et al. v. Republic of Costa Rica, Interim Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction
  • Spence International Investments et al. v. The Government of the Republic of Costa Rica, Procedural Order No. 1
• Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/14 View case details
  10 source documents

  • Claimant's Memorial
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Claimant's Reply Memorial
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Claimants' Rejoinder on Objections to Jurisdiction, Admissibility, or Competence
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Rejoinder on Objections to Jurisdiction, Admissibility, or Competence
  • Coropi Holdings Limited, Kalemegdan Investments Limited and Erinn Bernard Broshko v. Republic of Serbia, Respondent's Counter-Memorial
• Eurohold Bulgaria AD and Euroins Insurance Group AD v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/24/18 View case details
  7 source documents

  • Decision on the Respondent’s Rule 41 and Rule 48 Objections
  • Eurohold Bulgaria AD and Euroins Insurance Group AD v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Eurohold Bulgaria AD and Euroins Insurance Group AD v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Eurohold Bulgaria AD and Euroins Insurance Group AD v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 3 Non-Disputing Party Application to Intervene
  • Eurohold Bulgaria AD and Euroins Insurance Group AD v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 4 on Applications Under ICSID Arbitration Rules 67 and 68
  • italaw180979 - Eurohold and Euroins v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 5, December 15, 2025.pdf
  • italaw180979 - Eurohold and Euroins v. Romania, Procedural Order No. 6 on Non-disputing Parties’ Applications Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rules 67(5) and 68, February 16, 2026.pdf
• Hela Schwarz GmbH v. People's Republic of China, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/19 View case details
  9 source documents

  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 1
  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 2
  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 3
  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 4
  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 5
  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 6
  • Hela Schwarz v. China , Procedural Order No. 7
  • Hela Schwarz v. China, Award of the Tribunal, Dec 10, 2025
  • Hela Schwarz v. China, Procedural Order No. 8
• Human Rights Defenders Inc., as assignee of Natale Palazzo, Rodolfo Scodeller and Antonio Basile v. Swiss Confederation, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/29 View case details
  1 source document

  • Human Rights Defenders lnc. v. Switzerland, Order of the Tribunal Discontinuing the Proceeding
• Itisaluna Iraq LLC and others v. Republic of Iraq, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/10 View case details
  1 source document

  • Itisaluna Iraq LLC and others v. Republic of Iraq, Award

Arbitrator 10 cases in this role

• Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. 2015-07 View case details
  19 source documents

  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation, Decision on Jurisdiction
  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release III
  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release IV
  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release V
  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release on Interim Award
  • Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation,Proceedings Continue Notwithstanding the Non-Participation of the Russian Federation
  • Procedural Order No. 10
  • Procedural Order No. 11
  • Procedural Order No. 12
  • Procedural Order No. 13
  • Procedural Order No. 2
  • Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on Bifurcation)
  • Procedural Order No. 4
  • Procedural Order No. 5
  • Procedural Order No. 6
  • Procedural Order No. 7
  • Procedural Order No. 8
  • Procedural Order No. 9
  • Rules of Procedure
• Aktau Petrol Ticaret A.Ş. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/8 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Aktau Petrol Ticaret A.Ş. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Award
  • Aktau Petrol Ticaret A.Ş. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Decision on Annulment
  • Aktau Petrol Ticaret A.Ş. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Decision on the Continuation of the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
  • Aktau Petrol Ticaret A.Ş. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Procedural Order No. 3 Concerning the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
  • Aktau Petrol Ticaret A.Ş. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Procedural Order No. 4 Concerning the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
• Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/34 View case details
  6 source documents

  • Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, Decision on the Kingdom of Spain's request for reconsideration
  • Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, Procedural Order No. 6 (Second Decision on Reconsideration)
  • Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, Decision on Jurisdiction, Liability and Directions on Quantum
  • Cavalum SGPS, S.A. v. Kingdom of Spain, Dissenting Opinion of David R. Haigh
  • Cavalum SPGS v. Spain, Award, September 26, 2022
  • Cavalum SPGS v. Spain, Complaint, August 19, 2026
• Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2 View case details
  55 source documents

  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Reply Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Hedwig A. Lindner López
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Chamber of Commerce
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic and Centre for Intellectual Property Policy
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Dr. Burcu Kilic, Professor Brook K. Baker, Professor Cynthia Ho and Mr. Yaniv Heled
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Intellectual Property Law Professors
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of National Association of Manufacturers
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by CIPPIC (Univ of Ottawa) and CIPP (McGill Univ)
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Canadian Chamber of Commerce
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Dr. Grosse Ruse-Khan and Dr. Liddell and Dr. Waibel of Univ of Cambridge
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Five Intellectual Property Law Scholars
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by PhRMA and AMIIF and BIO
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Seven Intellectual Property Law Professors
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant's Opposition to Canada's Jurisdictional Objection
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Reply Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Confidentiality Order
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Expert Report of Ronald E. Dimock
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Final Award
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 1
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 2
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 3
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 4
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 5
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 6
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 7
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 8
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United Mexican States
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United States of America
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, NAFTA Article 1128 Supplemental Submission of United States of America
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Observations on Amicus Submissions
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Post-Hearing Brief – Annex A
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Submission on Costs
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Submission on Costs
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of T. David Reed
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbroo
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Witness Statement of Michael Gillen
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by National Association of Manufacturers
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada,Claimant’s Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions and Amicus Submission
  • Procedural Order No. 4
  • Second Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois
• KS Invest GmbH and TLS Invest GmbH v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/25 View case details
  2 source documents

  • KS Invest GmbH and TLS Invest GmbH v. Kingdom of Spain, Decision on Proposal to Disqualify Kaj Hober
  • KS Invest GmbH and TLS Invest GmbH v. Kingdom of Spain, Decision on the Proposal to Disqualify Gary Born
• Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahani v. Republic of Azerbaijan, PCA Case No. 2022-49 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahani v. Republic of Azerbaijan, Claimant's Statement of Rejoinder on Jurisdiction
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahani v. Republic of Azerbaijan, Claimant's Statement of Reply
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahani v. Republic of Azerbaijan, Respondent Objections to Jurisdiction and Statement of Defence
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahani v. Republic of Azerbaijan, Respondent's Statement of Rejoinder
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahani v. Republic of Azerbaijan, Statement of Claim
• Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahari v. Republic of Azerbaijan (II), PCA Case No. 2022-49 View case details
  4 source documents

  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahari v. Republic of Azerbaijan (II), Claimant's Statement of Claim
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahari v. Republic of Azerbaijan (II), Respondent's Objections to Jurisdiction and Statement of Defence
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahari v. Republic of Azerbaijan (II), Respondent's Statement of Rejoinder
  • Mohammad Reza Khalilpour Bahari v. Republic of Azerbaijan (II),Claimant's Statement of Reply
• PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. 2015-21 View case details
  27 source documents

  • Interim Award (Corrected)
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 11 Document Production [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 13 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 14 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 16 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 17 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 18 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 19 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 20 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 21 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 23 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 24 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 25 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 4 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 5
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 6 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 7
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. Russian Federation, Procedural Order No. 8 [Redacted]
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. The Russian Federation, Decision on Jurisdiction
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release II
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release III
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release IV
  • PJSC CB PrivatBank and Finance Company Finilon LLC v. The Russian Federation, PCA Press Release V
  • Partial Award
  • Procedural Order No. 12 [Redacted]
  • Procedural Order No. 22
  • Procedural Order No. 9 Confidentiality Order [Redacted]
• Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54 View case details
  39 source documents

  • Claimant Request for Interim Measures
  • Procedural Order No. 13
  • Procedural Order No. 14
  • Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Third-Party Funding
  • Response to Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Funding
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada's Letter re New Legal Authority and Re-Application for Security for Costs
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada's Submission on Costs
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Canada’s Submission on the Westmoreland Final Award
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II (Redacted)
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant Motion to Modify Procedural Schedule
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submissions
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant Response to Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant's E-mail to the Tribunal regarding the Application of the EU GDPR
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant's Submission on Confidentiality
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Claimant's Submission on Place of Arbitration
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, E-mail from the Claimant to the Tribunal regarding Respondent's Confidentiality Designations
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Final Award
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Investor's Statement of Costs
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Notice of Arbitration (Redacted)
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 4 (Interim Measures)
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Questions and Claimant's Response to the Tribunal GDPR Questions and Data Privacy Questions
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent E-mail re Claimant Motion to Modify Procedural Schedule
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production (Redacted)
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent Request for Bifurcation
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent Response to Claimant Request for Interim Measures
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal regarding EU GDPR
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal regarding Place of Arbitration and Transparency
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal regarding the Confidentiality Order
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Respondent's Response to Claimant's Submission on EU GDPR
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Response to Canada's Renewed Application for Security for Costs and Untimely Admission Request for New Authority
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Statement of Defence
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Tennant Energy's Post-Hearing Brief
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Tennant Energy’s Post-Hearing Comments on the Westmoreland Coal Award
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Non-Disputing Party Submissions
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Tribunal E-mail re Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Tribunal E-mail to the Parties
  • Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, Tribunal's Communication to the Parties
• UP (formerly Le Chèque Déjeuner) and C.D Holding Internationale v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/35 View case details
  2 source documents

  • UP (formerly Le Chèque Déjeuner) and C.D Holding Internationale v. Hungary, Award
  • UP and C.D Holding Internationale v. Hungary, Decision on Preliminary Issues of Jurisdiction