Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Spectrum UA Credit LLC v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/26/17

Short Name:

Spectrum v. Ukraine

Applicable Procedural Rules:
Seat of Arbitration:
Applicable Legal Instruments:

Available documents

20 Mar 2026
Request for Provisional Measures
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Produce a well-written, professionally drafted, highly sophisticated summary of the document such that all the key issues are covered. Maximum words: 300 words. Use legal writing tone and format. DO NOT use bullet points.



31 Mar 2026
Complaint before United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Complaint before United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Country in which this occurs:
Print reporter
Document Summary
Complaint before United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture and Background

This document is a Complaint filed by Spectrum UA Credit LLC and Geno Pikulik (Plaintiffs) against Ukraine, the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), the Deposit Guarantee Fund (DGF), and the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Plaintiffs assert subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), alleging that the Defendants are not entitled to sovereign immunity due to their engagement in commercial activities that caused a direct effect in the United States, as well as the expropriation of property in violation of international law.

Factual Allegations and Legal Claims

The Plaintiffs allege a coordinated campaign by the Defendants to unlawfully expropriate their investments in Ukraine. Specifically, the Plaintiffs contend that Spectrum Ukraine, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Spectrum UA Credit LLC, lawfully acquired substantial distressed assets and loan portfolios through DGF-administered auctions. Following allegedly unfounded assertions regarding the citizenship of Spectrum's ultimate beneficial owners, the NBU arbitrarily revoked Spectrum Ukraine's financial services license without affording due process or an opportunity to cure the alleged defects. Subsequently, the DGF unilaterally nullified the asset acquisitions and initiated proceedings to reclaim the assets while imposing substantial financial penalties.

The Complaint asserts multiple causes of action, including tortious interference with property rights, tortious interference with contracts, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, conversion, unjust enrichment, and civil conspiracy. Furthermore, the Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants' actions constitute a discriminatory expropriation of valuable property without due process or prompt, adequate, and effective compensation, in direct violation of the bilateral investment treaty between the United States and Ukraine.

Relief Sought

The Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment affirming the validity of the assignment of membership interests under California law and confirming Geno Pikulik as the sole lawful owner of Spectrum UA Credit LLC. Additionally, the Plaintiffs demand compensatory and consequential damages in excess of $127 million, representing the total value of the expropriated assets and lost investment opportunities, alongside pre-judgment interest and any further relief deemed appropriate by the Court.



17 Apr 2026
Registration of the Request for Arbitration
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Produce a well-written, professionally drafted, highly sophisticated summary of the document such that all the key issues are covered. Maximum words: 300 words. Use legal writing tone and format. DO NOT use bullet points.



26 Jun 2026
Claimant's Amended Request for Provisional Measures
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Produce a well-written, professionally drafted, highly sophisticated summary of the document such that all the key issues are covered. Maximum words: 300 words. Use legal writing tone and format. DO NOT use bullet points.