Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

AES v. Argentina, General Order for Civil Cases before the Honorable Reggie B. Walton, July 27, 2026

27 Jul 2026
AES Corporation v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/17 
General Order for Civil Cases before the Honorable Reggie B. Walton
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
General Order for Civil Cases before the Honorable Reggie B. Walton
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
General Order for Civil Cases before the Honorable Reggie B. Walton
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture and Purpose

This document is a General Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, establishing the mandatory procedural framework and rules of conduct for all civil cases assigned to the calendar of Judge Reggie B. Walton. The Order governs the proceedings in the enforcement action brought by AES Corporation against the Argentine Republic.

Procedural Directives and Court Requirements

The Order delineates strict compliance requirements regarding court communications, filing mechanics, and motion practice. It expressly prohibits ex parte communications with chambers and mandates that all motions be accompanied by a proposed order. The Court further outlines specific protocols for initial scheduling conferences, discovery dispute resolution, and the filing of administrative records. Notably, the Order establishes a presumption that all cases will be referred to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and requires parties to engage in early settlement discussions.

Directives on Generative AI and Extrajudicial Statements

Addressing modern practice considerations, the Court permits the use of generative artificial intelligence tools but imposes strict ethical obligations on counsel to ensure the accuracy and completeness of all representations and citations. Violations of these obligations are subject to sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c). Additionally, the Order restricts counsel from making extrajudicial statements that are substantially likely to have a materially prejudicial effect on the proceedings, ensuring the integrity of the judicial process.