Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw portal. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

AES Corporation v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/17 

New
Short Name:

Case type:
International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)
Seat of Arbitration:
Investment treaty:
Argentina-United States BIT
Applicable legal instruments:
Economic sector:
Energy (power generation)
Outcome:
In Favour of Claimant(s)
Amount of damages:
US $71,590,000
Other remedy:
The Respondent is ordered to bear all arbitration costs and pay 80% of the Claimant’s legal fees and expenses. Additionally, the Respondent must pay simple interest on the damages and all other costs.
See case mapped on Investor-State LawGuide

Available documents

26 Apr 2005
Decision on Jurisdiction
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Decision on Jurisdiction
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Claimant appointee:
Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Domingo Bello Janeiro
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Pierre-Marie Dupuy
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Decision on Jurisdiction
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


6 Apr 2022
Decision on the Respondent's Proposal to Disqualify all Members of the Tribunal
Document provided by: ICSID Website
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Decision on the Respondent's Proposal to Disqualify all Members of the Tribunal
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Domingo Bello Janeiro
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Ricardo Ramírez Hernández
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Decision on the Respondent's Proposal to Disqualify all Members of the Tribunal
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


15 May 2025
Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Domingo Bello Janeiro (English)
Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Domingo Bello Janeiro (Spanish)
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Domingo Bello Janeiro (English)
Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Domingo Bello Janeiro (Spanish)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Claimant appointee:
Stephen L. Drymer
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Domingo Bello Janeiro
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Ricardo Ramírez Hernández
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
James Hosking, Aníbal Sabater, Caline Mouawad, Matilde Flores, May Khoury, Silvia Marroquin, Chaffetz Lindsey LLP, Ignacio Minorini Lima, Maria Laura Rozan, Bruchou & Funes de Rioja, Nigel Blackaby, Juan Pomés, Ezequiel Vetulli, Joseph Spadafore, Virginie Lassez, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, Marc Michael, AES Corporation
Respondent's counsel
Santiago María Castro Videla, Juan Ignacio Stampalija, Julio Pablo Comadira, Mariana Mabel Lozza, María Alejandra Etchegorry, Procuración del Tesoro de la Nación, Eduardo Silva Romero, José Manuel García Represa, Javier Echeverri, Ruxandra Esanu, Wordstone Dispute Resolution AARPI
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Domingo Bello Janeiro (English)
Dissenting Opinion of Prof. Domingo Bello Janeiro (Spanish)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


30 May 2025
Award of the Tribunal (English)
Award of the Tribunal (Spanish)
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Award of the Tribunal (English)
Award of the Tribunal (Spanish)
Participants listed for this document only; this may not include all participants involved in the entire case.
Claimant appointee
Claimant appointee:
Stephen L. Drymer
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Domingo Bello Janeiro
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Ricardo Ramírez Hernández
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
James Hosking, Aníbal Sabater, Caline Mouawad, Matilde Flores, May Khoury, Silvia Marroquin, Chaffetz Lindsey LLP, Ignacio Minorini Lima, Maria Laura Rozan, Bruchou & Funes de Rioja, Nigel Blackaby, Juan Pomés, Ezequiel Vetulli, Joseph Spadafore, Virginie Lassez, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, Marc Michael, AES Corporation
Respondent's counsel
Santiago María Castro Videla, Juan Ignacio Stampalija, Julio Pablo Comadira, Mariana Mabel Lozza, María Alejandra Etchegorry, Procuración del Tesoro de la Nación, Eduardo Silva Romero, José Manuel García Represa, Javier Echeverri, Ruxandra Esanu, Wordstone Dispute Resolution AARPI
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Award of the Tribunal (English)
Award of the Tribunal (Spanish)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.