AES Corporation v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/17
Case type:
Applicable arbitration rules:
Investment treaty:
Applicable legal instruments:
Economic sector:
Outcome:
Amount of damages:
US $71,590,000
Other remedy:
The Respondent is ordered to bear all arbitration costs and pay 80% of the Claimant’s legal fees and expenses. Additionally, the Respondent must pay simple interest on the damages and all other costs.
Available documents
26
Apr 2005
Claimant appointee:
Respondent appointee:
Arbitrator(s):
Chair/President:
Judges:
Claimant's counsel:
Respondent's counsel:
Annulment Committee president:
Annulment Committee members:
6
Apr 2022
Claimant appointee:
Respondent appointee:
Arbitrator(s):
Chair/President:
Judges:
Claimant's counsel:
Respondent's counsel:
Annulment Committee president:
Annulment Committee members:
15
May 2025
Claimant appointee:
Respondent appointee:
Arbitrator(s):
Chair/President:
Judges:
Claimant's counsel:
James Hosking, Aníbal Sabater, Caline Mouawad, Matilde Flores, May Khoury, Silvia Marroquin, Chaffetz Lindsey LLP, Ignacio Minorini Lima, Maria Laura Rozan, Bruchou & Funes de Rioja, Nigel Blackaby, Juan Pomés, Ezequiel Vetulli, Joseph Spadafore, Virginie Lassez, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, Marc Michael, AES Corporation
Respondent's counsel:
Annulment Committee president:
Annulment Committee members:
31
May 2025
Claimant appointee:
Respondent appointee:
Arbitrator(s):
Chair/President:
Judges:
Claimant's counsel:
James Hosking, Aníbal Sabater, Caline Mouawad, Matilde Flores, May Khoury, Silvia Marroquin, Chaffetz Lindsey LLP, Ignacio Minorini Lima, Maria Laura Rozan, Bruchou & Funes de Rioja, Nigel Blackaby, Juan Pomés, Ezequiel Vetulli, Joseph Spadafore, Virginie Lassez, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP, Marc Michael, AES Corporation
Respondent's counsel:
Annulment Committee president:
Annulment Committee members: