Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

GPGC v. Ghana, Satisfaction of Judgment, September 18, 2025

18 Dec 2025
Ghana Power Generation Company v. Republic of Ghana, PCA Case No. 2019-05
View case details
Satisfaction of Judgment
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Satisfaction of Judgment
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Sara Tofighbakhsh, Robert K. Kry
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Ghana Power Generation Company, MoloLamken, Ghana
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Satisfaction of Judgment
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document constitutes a Satisfaction of Judgment filed by the Petitioner, GPGC Limited, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, formally acknowledging the resolution of its enforcement action against the Respondent, the Government of Ghana.

The filing confirms that the Respondent has fully performed its financial obligations pursuant to a Settlement Agreement executed by the parties on October 4, 2024. Consequently, the Petitioner acknowledges the full satisfaction of two prior court orders: the principal judgment entered on September 5, 2024, in the amount of $113,530,980.96 (plus applicable post-judgment interest), and a subsequent fee judgment entered on September 23, 2024, awarding $124,744 in attorney’s fees.

In its operative request, the Petitioner certifies that there are no outstanding executions on either judgment with any sheriff or marshal. The document formally authorizes the Clerk of the Court to enter a full and complete satisfaction of both the principal and fee judgments on the official docket, thereby concluding the enforcement proceedings.