Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Buried Hill Serdar v. Turkmenistan, Procedural Order No. 1, May 27, 2026

27 May 2026
Buried Hill Serdar Limited v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/40
Procedural Order No. 1
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Procedural Order No. 1
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Procedural Order No. 1
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Background

This Procedural Order No. 1 establishes the procedural framework governing the arbitration proceedings between the Claimant and Turkmenistan, conducted pursuant to the ICSID Arbitration Rules in force as of July 1, 2022. The Tribunal, reconstituted following the disqualification of a prior member, confirmed its proper constitution and the availability of its members to adjudicate the dispute.

Procedural Rules and Document Production

The Tribunal set forth comprehensive directives regarding the routing of communications, the sequence of pleadings, and the submission of documentary evidence. Notably, the Tribunal determined that the document production phase shall be guided, though not strictly bound, by the 2020 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration. The Order imposes a strict limit of 25 document requests per party, requiring the use of a Stern Schedule for all requests, objections, and replies.

Witness Evidence and Hearing Logistics

The Order delineates the protocols for witness and expert testimony, mandating that written statements serve as direct examination, subject to limited oral direct examination at the hearing. The Tribunal reserved the right to summon witnesses independently and established the parameters for cross-examination and re-direct examination. Furthermore, the Order designates Paris, France, as the place of the proceeding, while retaining the Tribunal's discretion to conduct hearings remotely or in a hybrid format depending on prevailing public health or security circumstances.