Participant Type:
Law Firm
Involved in 19 cases (17 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Foreign Investment Law (Investor–State) · 1 Contract (Investor–State) · 1 Other Treaty-Based Disputes) · evidenced by 100 case documents on record
Claimant's Law Firm 3 cases in this role
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/14 View case details
19 source documents
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Annex to Procedural Order No. 2
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Award of the Tribunal
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Claimants’ Memorial
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Claimants’ Rejoinder on Respondent’s Application for Provisional Measures
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Claimants’ Reply on their Application for Provisional Measures and Answer to Respondent’s Application for Provisional Measures
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Emmanuel Gaillard
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Order of the ad hoc Committee on the Discontinuance of the Proceeding
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 1
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 2
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on the Parties' Request for Provisional Measures
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 4
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 5
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 6
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Procedural Order No. 7
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Respondent’s Application for Provisional Measures and Opposition to Claimants’ Application for Provisional Measures
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Respondent’s Counter-Memorial
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Respondent’s Rejoinder
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Respondent’s Reply Application for Provisional Measures and Rejoinder to Claimants’ Application for Provisional Measures
- EuroGas Inc. and Belmont Resources Inc. v. Slovak Republic, Transcript of the First Session and Hearing on Provisional Measures
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/8 View case details
26 source documents
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Respondent’s Rejoinder
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Claimants’ Memorial
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Claimants’ Reply
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Claimants’ Reply to Request for Bifurcation
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Counter-Memorial on Annulment
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Decision on the Claimants’ Request for a Supplementary Decision on the Award
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Memorial on Annulment
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Oder No. 1
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 1
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 2
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 2
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 3
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 4
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 5
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 6
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Procedural Order No. 8
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Rand’s Statement of Costs
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Redacted Award
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Reply on Annulment
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Request for Arbitration
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Respondent’s Counter-Memorial with Request for Bifurcation
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Respondent’s Rejoinder on Annulment
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia, Revised Annex A to Procedural Order No. 1
- Rand Investments Ltd. and others v. Republic of Serbia,Serbia’s Statement of Costs
- William Archibald Rand v. Republic of Serbia, Application for Partial Annulment
- italaw180989 - Rand Investments and others v. Serbia, Decision on the Application for Partial Annulment of the Award (redacted) (May 20, 2026)
- Republic of Croatia v. MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc, PCA Case No. 2014-15 View case details
4 source documents
- MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc v. Republic of Croatia, Decision on the Claimant's Application for Interim Measures
- MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc v. Republic of Croatia, Final Award
- Republic of Croatia v. MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc, Joint Statement of the Parties Regarding Statements in the Croatian Press
- Republic of Croatia v. MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc, Notice of Arbitration
Respondent's Law Firm 16 cases in this role
- 9REN Holding S.a.r.l v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/15 View case details
- ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/22 View case details
5 source documents
- ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, Procedural Order No. 2
- ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, Award
- ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, Procedural Order No. 1
- ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, Procedural Order No. 3
- ACP Axos Capital GmbH v. Republic of Kosovo, Procedural Order No. 4
- Antaris Solar GmbH and Dr. Michael Göde v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2014-01 View case details
- Basel LLC and Ronald Waldmann v. Georgia, ICSID Case No. ARB/23/23 View case details
- Bellwether International Inc. and Tecnipetrol Inc. v. Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Pública de Hidrocarburos del Ecuador (EP Petroecuador), ICSID Case No. ARB/25/12 View case details
- Buried Hill Serdar Limited v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/40 View case details
- Dirk Herzig as Insolvency Administrator over the Assets of Unionmatex Industrieanlagen GmbH v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/35 View case details
3 source documents
- Dirk Herzig (Insolvency Administrator of Unionmatex Industrieanlagen) v. Turkmenistan, Decision on Security for Costs
- Dirk Herzig as Insolvency Administrator over the Assets of Unionmatex Industrieanlagen GmbH v. Turkmenistan, Notice of Dispute
- Dirk Herzig as Insolvency Administrator over the Assets of Unionmatex Industrieanlagen GmbH v. Turkmenistan, Press Release by Respondent Counsel on Final Award
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/21/51 View case details
7 source documents
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Award of the Tribunal
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits - Transcript Day 1
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits - Transcript Day 2
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits - Transcript Day 3
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits - Transcript Day 4
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits - Transcript Day 5
- Discovery Global LLC v. Slovak Republic, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits - Transcript Day 6
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan (II), ICSID Case No. ARB/24/13 View case details
9 source documents
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan (III), Procedural Order No. 3 (Decision on the Respondent's Request for Security for Costs)
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan (III), Procedural Order No. 4
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan (II), Procedural Order No. 6
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan (II), Procedural Order No. 7
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan (III), Procedural Order No. 5
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, Procedural Order No. 1
- Lotus Proje Akaryakıt Enerji Madencilik Telekominikasyon İnşaat Sanayi Taah. Ve Tic. A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, Procedural Order No. 2
- Lotus v. Turkmenistan (II), Order of Discontinuance, April 14, 2026
- Lotus v. Turkmenistan (II), Procedural Order No. 8, Oct 27, 2025
- MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc v. Republic of Croatia (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/13/32 View case details
- Plaza Centers N.V. v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/22/15 View case details
1 source document
- RSE Holdings AG v. Republic of Latvia (II), PCA Case no. 2022-41 View case details
- SECE İnşaat ve Ticaret A.Ş. v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/34 View case details
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/24 View case details
7 source documents
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, Award of the Tribunal
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, Decision on Respondent's Application for Provisional Measures
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, Decision on the Application for Leave to Intervene as a Non-Disputing Party Submitted by the European Commission
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, Procedural Order No. 1
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, Procedural Order No. 1 (Amended Version)
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia, Procedural Order No. 3
- United Utilities (Tallinn) B.V. and Aktsiaselts Tallinna Vesi v. Republic of Estonia,Dissent of Arbitrator David Williams
- Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria View case details
- Alejandro Diego Díaz Gaspar v. Republic of Costa Rica, ICSID Case No. ARB/19/13 View case details

