Société des Mines de Loulo S.A. v. Republic of Mali, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/16
Short Name:
Case type:
Seat of Arbitration:
Investment treaty:
Applicable legal instruments:
Economic sector:
Outcome:
Other remedy:
The tribunal decided that Mali should bear 70% of the procedural costs and expenses, while Somilo should bear 30%.
Available documents
2
Jun 2016
Claimant appointee:
Respondent appointee:
Arbitrator(s):
Chair/President:
Judges:
Claimant's counsel:
Respondent's counsel:
[field_expert_claimant][field_expert_respondent][field_expert_other]
Annulment Committee president:
Annulment Committee members: