Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Afik and others v. Cyprus, Procedural Order No. 2 on Transparency and Confidentiality, June 19, 2026

19 Jun 2026
Yaacov Afik, Michael Mistriel Aykout and Shimon Mistriel Aykout v. Republic of Cyprus, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/45
Procedural Order No. 2 on Transparency and Confidentiality
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Procedural Order No. 2 on Transparency and Confidentiality
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Procedural Order No. 2 on Transparency and Confidentiality
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Background

This Procedural Order No. 2 establishes the transparency and confidentiality regime governing the arbitration proceedings between the Claimants and the Republic of Cyprus. Following the circulation of a draft order and subsequent discussions during the first session held on May 7, 2026, the Tribunal issued this Order to formalize the Parties' agreements and the Tribunal's determinations pursuant to the ICSID Convention and the 2022 ICSID Arbitration Rules.

Tribunal's Directions on Transparency

The Tribunal directed that, absent the Parties' consent, the Centre shall only publish excerpts of the Award and any supplementary decisions, rectifications, interpretations, revisions, or annulment decisions, in accordance with ICSID Arbitration Rule 62(4). However, the Parties expressly consented to the publication of any decision upholding jurisdiction as part of the eventual Award. Furthermore, the Tribunal ordered the publication of its orders and decisions, subject to agreed or Tribunal-directed redactions pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 63.

Conversely, the Tribunal recorded the Parties' lack of consent regarding the publication of written submissions. The Tribunal further ruled that supporting documents, including exhibits, legal authorities, witness statements, and expert reports, shall remain unpublished. Hearings shall be closed to the public unless the Parties agree otherwise at least two months prior to the hearing, in which case a protocol for public access and the protection of confidential information will be established. Finally, transcripts and recordings of hearings are strictly precluded from publication by ICSID.