Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

NextEra Energy v. Spain, Motion of Respondents to Extend the Time to File a Response, Jul 2, 2025

2 Jul 2025
NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. and NextEra Energy Spain Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/11
View case details
Motion of Respondents to Extend the Time to File a Response
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Motion of Respondents to Extend the Time to File a Response
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Carter G. Phillips
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Shay Dvoretzky, Matthew S. Rozen
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Sidley Austin, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Blasket Renewable Investments, NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V., Spain
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Motion of Respondents to Extend the Time to File a Response
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a letter filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of Respondents NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V., NextEra Energy Spain Holdings B.V., and 9REN Holdings S.À.R.L. in the matter of Kingdom of Spain v. Blasket Renewable Investments LLC, et al. (No. 24-1130). Pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 15.3 and 30.4, counsel requests a further 30-day extension of time, to August 8, 2025, to file the response to the Petitioner's writ of certiorari. The letter states that this is the second extension request and is necessitated by counsel's significant and conflicting professional commitments, including other cert-stage and appellate court briefings. The filing confirms that neither the Petitioner, the Kingdom of Spain, nor the other named Respondent, Blasket Renewable Investments LLC, opposes the requested extension.