Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

italaw180947 - Global Voice Group v. ARPT and Guinea, Order of the United States District for the District of Columbia, May 29, 2026.pdf

18 Feb 2025
Global Voice Group SA v. The Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Guinea, and the Republic of Guinea, ICC Case No. 22467/DDA , ICC Case No. 22467/DDA
View case details
Order of the United States District for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Order of the United States District for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Jia M. Cobb
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Global Voice Group, Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Guinea, Guinea
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Order of the United States District for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This final and appealable Order from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia resolves several pending motions and terminates the proceedings initiated by Global Voice Group SA against the Republic of Guinea. The Court's rulings are based on reasoning provided in a separate, accompanying memorandum opinion.

The Court granted the Defendant Republic of Guinea's motion to set aside default and its motion to dismiss the case. As a direct consequence of the dismissal, the Court denied the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment or summary judgment as moot. Additionally, the Court granted the Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply and denied the Defendant's motion for sanctions. The Order concludes by directing the Clerk of Court to dismiss and terminate the case.