This HTML version is machine-generated. Always consult the original document.Original document (PDF), opens in new tab

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE 1976 UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

between

RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS INC.

Claimant

and

GOVERNMENT OF CANADA

Respondent

(PCA CASE NO. 2016-13)


PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 7
ON SCHEDULING THE MERITS AND DAMAGES PHASE


ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL:

Judge James R. Crawford, AC (President)

Dean Ronald A. Cass

Dean Céline Lévesque

March 23, 2018

[Page 1]

1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

1.1 The Tribunal issued its Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility on January 30, 2018.

1.2 Following an invitation by the Tribunal to consult on next steps, the Disputing Parties informed the Tribunal on March 16, 2018 that they had agreed on a schedule for the merits and damages phase. The agreed schedule incorporates two rounds of simultaneous document production. The Disputing Parties informed the Tribunal that they had agreed to this procedure with the “understanding that the second document production should be narrow and tailored.” They further agreed that each request “should be the consequence of the pleadings and should identify with precision a statement, claim, or argument in the other Disputing Party's pleading that warrants further discovery or additional documents.”

2. ORDER

2.1 The Tribunal approves the schedule agreed by the Disputing Parties for the Merits and Damages Phase, which shall be as follows:

Procedural Step Time Period Date
A. Tribunal's Procedural Order on the schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase March 23, 2018
B. Exchange of requests for the production of documents 28 days April 20, 2018
C. Objections to requests for the production of documents 28 days May 18, 2018
D. Responses to objections to requests for the production of documents 21 days June 8, 2018
E. Production of documents in response to undisputed document requests 14 days June 22, 2018
F. Submission of Redfern Schedule for disputed document requests / application to the Tribunal for Order on disputed requests for the production of documents 7 days June 29, 2018

[Page 2]

Procedural Step Time Period Date
G. Tribunal's Order on the production of documents 21 days July 20, 2018
H. Production of documents as ordered by the Tribunal 28 days August 17, 2018
I. Claimant's Memorial on the Merits and Damages 60 days October 16, 2018
J. Respondent's Counter-Memorial on the Merits and Damages 62 days December 17, 2018
K. Exchange of additional requests for the production of documents. Each additional request should be the consequence of the pleadings and should identify with precision a statement, claim, or argument in the other Disputing Party's pleading that warrants further discovery or additional documents. 30 days January 16, 2019
L. Objections to additional requests for the production of documents 14 days January 30, 2019
M. Production of documents in response to undisputed additional document requests

Responses to objections to disputed additional document requests
14 days February 13, 2019
N. Submission of Redfern Schedule for disputed document requests/ application to the Tribunal for Order on disputed requests for the production of documents 7 days February 20, 2019
O. Tribunal's Order on the production of additional documents 14 days March 6, 2019
P. Production of additional documents as ordered by the Tribunal 14 days March 20, 2019
Q. Claimant's Reply Memorial on the Merits and Damages 30 days April 19, 2019

[Page 3]

Procedural Step Time Period Date
R. Respondent's Rejoinder Memorial on the Merits and Damages 45 days June 3, 2019
S. NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions and Amici Submissions/Applications 30 days July 3, 2019
T. Disputing Parties' comments in response to Article 1128 Submissions and Amici Submissions/Applications 30 days August 2, 2019
U. Pre-hearing conference and List of Issues to the Disputing Parties per Article 22 of Procedural Order No. 1 30 days before V (approx.) TBD
V. Hearing on the Merits and Damages TBD TBD

2.2 As agreed by the Parties, each document production request should be the consequence of the pleadings and should identify with precision a statement, claim, or argument in the other Disputing Party's pleading that warrants further discovery or additional documents.

Date: March 23, 2018

For the Arbitral Tribunal

Signature

Judge James R. Crawford, AC