INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES
Continental Gold Inc.
v.
Republic of Colombia
(ICSID Case No. ARB/24/25)
Members of the Tribunal
Prof. Dr. Klaus Sachs, President of the Tribunal
Ms. Elisabeth Eljuri, Arbitrator
Ms. Loretta Malintoppi, Arbitrator
Secretary of the Tribunal
Ms. Elisa Méndez Bräutigam
14 March 2025
[Page 2]
Article 830: Public Access to Hearing and Documents
- Any Tribunal award under this Section shall be publicly available, subject to the deletion of confidential information. All other documents submitted to, or issued by, the Tribunal shall be publicly available, unless the disputing parties otherwise agree, subject to the deletion of confidential information. A disputing party providing information that it claims is confidential has the burden of designating it as confidential.
- Hearings held under this Section shall be open to the public. The Tribunal may hold portions of hearings in camera to the extent necessary to ensure the protection of confidential information. The Tribunal shall establish procedures for the protection of confidential information and appropriate logistical arrangements for open hearings, in consultation with the disputing parties.
- A disputing party may disclose to other persons in connection with the arbitral proceedings such unredacted documents as it considers necessary for the preparation of its case, but it shall ensure that those persons protect the confidential information in such documents.
- The Parties may share with officials of their respective national and sub-national governments all relevant unredacted documents in the course of dispute settlement under this Agreement, but they shall ensure that those persons protect any confidential information in such documents.
- To the extent that a Tribunal’s confidentiality order designates information as confidential and a Party’s law on access to information requires public access to
[Page 3]
that information, the Party’s law on access to information shall prevail. However, a Party should endeavour to apply its law on access to information so as to protect information designated confidential by the Tribunal.
- Nothing in this Section requires a disputing Party to disclose, furnish or allow access to information that it may withhold in accordance with Article 2202 (Exceptions – National Security) or Article 2205 (Exceptions – Disclosure of Information).
Rule 66 Confidential or Protected Information
For the purposes of Rules 62-65, confidential or protected information is information which is protected from public disclosure:
(a) by the instrument of consent to arbitration;
(b) by the applicable law or applicable rules;
(c) in the case of information of a State party to the dispute, by the law of that State;
(d) in accordance with the orders and decisions of the Tribunal;
(e) by agreement of the parties;
(f) because it constitutes confidential business information or protected personal information;
(g) because public disclosure would impede law enforcement;
(h) because a State party to the dispute considers that public disclosure would be contrary to its essential security interests;
(i) because public disclosure would aggravate the dispute between the parties; or
(j) because public disclosure would undermine the integrity of the arbitral process.
[Page 4]
[Page 5]
[Page 6]
On behalf of the Tribunal,
[Signed]
Professor Dr. Klaus Sachs
President of the Tribunal
Date: 14 March 2025
1 As the proceeding will conclude upon dispatch of the Tribunal’s Award, any costs incurred after the dispatch of the Award (e.g., arbitrator fees for time spent addressing disputed redactions) will not be considered part of the costs of the proceeding. To ensure the payment of any fees incurred by the former Members of the Tribunal in connection with disputes over redactions of the Award, the Parties agree that ICSID will maintain the case trust fund open after the proceeding is concluded. ICSID will close the case trust fund once the arbitrators have submitted their claims for fees relating to the resolution of disputes over redactions of the Award, if any. ↩
[Page 7]
| [insert Party] | Request [1] |
| Information sought to be protected from disclosure | |
| Legal basis for protection | |
| Comments | |
| Reply by opposing Party | |
| Decision |