This HTML version is machine-generated. Always consult the original document.Original document (PDF), opens in new tab

COUR PERMANENTE D'ARBITRAGE

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BEFORE A TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE CABINET OF MINISTERS OF UKRAINE ON THE ENCOURAGEMENT AND MUTUAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS DATED 27 NOVEMBER 1998

- and -

THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW, 1976

PCA CASE NO. 2015-21

- between -

JSC CB PRIVATBANK

The Claimant

- and -

THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

The Respondent


PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 13
(CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS)


The Arbitral Tribunal
Professor Pierre-Marie Dupuy (Presiding Arbitrator)
Sir Daniel Bethlehem QC
Dr. Václav Mikulka

Registry
Permanent Court of Arbitration

23 October 2020

[Page 2]

1. Procedural Background

1.1 On 23 June 2020, the Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 9 (“PO9”), a Confidentiality Order with respect to documents to be filed by the Parties in these proceedings.

1.2 Paragraph 2.2 of PO9 states that “[a]ll documents prepared and filed by the Parties specifically in relation to these proceedings (including pleadings, witness statements, expert reports and correspondence with the Tribunal) (collectively, the ‘Arbitration Documents’) shall be kept confidential.”

1.3 Paragraph 2.3 of PO9 provides that “[e]ither Party may apply to the Tribunal to designate any other materials as strictly confidential that the designating Party identifies as containing information that is highly sensitive and strictly regulated by applicable law (collectively, ‘Confidential Materials’).”

1.4 On 7 September 2020, the Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 11 (“PO11”), ordering the Claimant to produce certain documents requested by the Respondent.

1.5 [Redacted]

1.6 [Redacted]

1.7 [Redacted]

[Redacted]

[Page 3]

[Redacted]

2. The Tribunal’s Decision

2.1 Having carefully considered the Parties’ respective arguments, the Tribunal orders as follows.

2.2 To the extent that any documents for which a designation of strict confidentiality is requested do not qualify as Arbitration Documents under Paragraph 2.2 of PO9, such documents are provisionally designated as Confidential Materials pursuant to Paragraph 2.3 of PO9.

2.3 Should the Respondent intend to use Arbitration Documents or Confidential Materials as provided in Paragraph 2.4 (c) or (d) of PO9, it shall notify the Tribunal in accordance with Paragraph 2.5 of PO9.

2.4 Either Party shall remain at liberty to apply for a modification of this order in respect of specific documents that have been herein provisionally designated as Confidential Materials.

Date: 23 October 2020

Place of Arbitration: The Hague, the Netherlands

Signature

On behalf of the Tribunal
Professor Pierre-Marie Dupuy
Presiding Arbitrator