[Page 1]
WHITE & CASE
September 16, 2022
Dirección General de Integración Económica y Política Comercial
Secretaría de Estado en el Despacho de Desarrollo Económico
Centro Cívico Gubernamental
Torre 1, Piso 9
Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Formerly:
Dirección General de Integración Económica y Política Comercial
Secretaría de Estado en los Despachos de Industria y Comercio
Boulevard José Cecilio del Valle
Edificio San José, antiguo edificio de Fenaduanah
Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Dear Sir/Madam,
In accordance with Article 10.16 of the Dominican Republic-Central America–United States Free Trade Agreement (“CAFTA-DR”), Honduras Próspera Inc. (“Honduras Próspera”) and its affiliates St. John’s Bay Development Company LLC (“SJBDC”) and Próspera Arbitration Center LLC (“PAC” and, jointly with Honduras Próspera and SJBDC, the “Próspera Group” or “Claimants”), respectfully submit to the Republic of Honduras (“Honduras”) this written notice of their intention to submit claims to arbitration. This notice is delivered pursuant to Annex 10-G of the CAFTA-DR.
The Próspera Group previously delivered a Request for Consultation and Negotiation dated June 3, 2022 to Honduras pursuant to Article 10.15 of the CAFTA-DR, to which Honduras has not responded. This letter followed letters dated April 26 and May 11, 2022 to President Castro and various other Honduran officials, which also sought constructive dialogue and also remain unanswered.
The Próspera Group remains willing to pursue a constructive dialogue seeking to resolve the dispute amicably and hereby reiterates its commitment to working with Honduras to find a mutually advantageous solution that, in addition to resolving this international dispute, would also be an opportunity for Honduras to enhance competitiveness, foster creativity and innovation, create opportunities for economic and social development, and enhance worker's rights, among other goals of the CAFTA-DR, and which would send a positive message to other international investors and institutions. The next 90 days present an opening for settling this investment dispute and avoiding the commencement of an international arbitration proceeding. Claimants sincerely hope that consultation and negotiation in good faith will take place.
In the event that the investment dispute still cannot be settled within 90 days, Claimants intend to submit their claims to international arbitration pursuant the CAFTA-DR and Honduras will be required to compensate the Próspera Group for the full value of their losses in accordance with international law.
[Page 2]
The Próspera Group consists of the following enterprises of the United States:
For the purpose of this dispute, Claimants are represented by White & Case LLP:
| Ank Santens White & Case LLP 1221 6th Ave. New York, NY 10020 [email protected] |
Francisco X. Jijón White & Case LLP 701 Thirteenth St. NW Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] |
All communications with Claimants in connection with this matter should be addressed to their counsel.
Honduras Próspera is the promoter and organizer of Próspera ZEDE, a special employment and economic development zone (“ZEDE”) with locations in the Bay Islands and Atlántida Departments in Honduras.
Since 2018, the Próspera Group has made significant investments in Honduras directly and through various enterprises in Honduras that the Próspera Group owns or controls directly or indirectly, and thereby made Próspera ZEDE a strong platform for economic development. Among other things, Próspera ZEDE has an innovative regulatory environment, a minimum wage that is 10% to 25% higher than the national minimum wage, and conditions for Hondurans to start businesses more easily than elsewhere in Honduras. Already, hundreds of construction, maintenance, and knowledge economy jobs have been created, nearly 100 businesses have been formed or registered to do business within Próspera ZEDE, and over 500 individuals have become (e)Residents. The Próspera Group has acquired or optioned rights to over 1000 acres for Próspera ZEDE and is in the process of modernizing and renovating a luxury resort, while modern affordable mixed-use tower buildings, remote work offices, and a light robotic manufacturing building are under construction. The Próspera Group has also incorporated subsidiary entities in Honduras, acquired contractual, intellectual property and other rights, and made other investments to further the development of Próspera ZEDE. The Próspera Group is also providing and plans to provide infrastructure needed for an international financial center, light manufacturing, high-skill remote work, medical tourism, and advanced energy projects, as part of a plan to invest US$ 500 million in Honduras by 2025.
[Page 3]
The Próspera Group invested in Honduras in reliance on the ZEDE legal framework and commitments made by Honduras under Honduran law, international treaties, and agreements, among others, guarantees of legal stability of the ZEDE legal framework for at least fifty (50) years. This includes, but is not limited to, the following:
The constitutionality of Articles 294, 303 and 329 of the Honduras Constitution and the ZEDE Organic Law was subsequently confirmed by Honduras, including, inter alia by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court.
1 Ley Orgánica de las Zonas de Empleo y Desarrollo Económico (ZEDE) (Decree No. 120-2013), published on September 6, 2013. ↩
[Page 4]
should be guaranteed to the investments and the investors of the State of Kuwait for a timeframe of not less than fifty (50) years.” This legal stability guarantee automatically extended to investors of the United States such as the Próspera Group pursuant to the MFN provision of the ZEDE Organic Law described above, as was subsequently confirmed by Honduras, as well as the MFN provision in the CAFTA-DR.
Honduras, through its acts and omissions, has violated its obligations with respect to the Próspera Group and its investments. On April 21 and 22, 2022, the National Congress of Honduras passed (i) Decree No. 32-2022, which began the process of amending Articles 294, 303 and 329 to the Constitution to remove the ZEDE legal framework and declare invalid all the legal norms derived therefrom, including the Organic ZEDE Law, laws, regulations, resolutions, and any other resolutions, acts, contracts, concessions or any other related norm in favor of the ZEDEs; and (ii) Decree No. 33-2022, which repealed the Organic ZEDE Law with immediate effect along with all other legislation, legal norms, dispositions or legal precepts derived from or relating to the Organic ZEDE Law. Neither Decree addresses the status of existing ZEDEs.
On April 26, 2022, Honduras Próspera sent a letter to the President of Honduras, copying various other Honduran officials, seeking confirmation of its understanding that, in view of the various guarantees of legal stability, the ZEDE legal framework remains in full effect for Próspera ZEDE, and communicating its
[Page 5]
willingness to engage in discussions with the State. There was no response whatsoever from Honduras to this letter. Honduras also remained silent in response to a follow-up letter dated May 11, 2022 reiterating the same points and requesting a response. Accordingly, Claimants sent a formal request for consultations and negotiations under Article 10.15 of the CAFTA-DR on June 3, 2022. To the date of submission of this notice Honduras has not responded, even though it has reportedly entered into negotiations with other existing ZEDEs.
Meanwhile, Honduras appears to have taken steps to interfere with the Próspera Group’s rights. This includes the Honduras Customs Administration Agency’s refusal to recognize Próspera ZEDE’s independent customs authority under the Organic ZEDE Law and to maintain enough resources to allow for efficient custom clearance, as well as interferences by the Honduras National Commission on Banks and Insurance with the Próspera Group’s capacity to freely transfer funds both directly and through authorized intermediaries and financial institutions. At the same time, there are conflicting messages in the Honduran media, with some officials claiming that the ZEDEs no longer validly exist, while others have suggested that there is a one-year transition period but the purpose of this period and the status at the end of it remain entirely unclear. The result is a complete lack of clarity as to the future of Próspera ZEDE and the Próspera Group’s investments therein.
As summarized above, an investment dispute exists between the Próspera Group and Honduras that has not been settled through consultation and negotiation as requested by Claimants. As of the date hereof, Honduras has already breached its obligations under Article 10.5 (Minimum Standard of Treatment) and Article 10.8 (Transfers) of the CAFTA-DR, including through conduct that is manifestly arbitrary, grossly unfair, unjust, idiosyncratic, and lacking in due process, and that has created serious uncertainty and doubts about the situation of Próspera ZEDE, as well as through its apparent interference with Claimants’ right to freely transfer funds. In addition, if, as may now be reasonably inferred, Honduras does not respect its legal stability commitments and/or takes the position that Próspera ZEDE does not validly exist, it will have breached numerous obligations under Section A of Chapter 10 of the CAFTA-DR, the Charter, and the Legal Stability Agreement.
Absent an amicable settlement of the investment dispute, which the Próspera Group hopes may still be possible, and if Honduras continues to fail to acknowledge its legal stability commitments and Próspera ZEDE’s valid existence, Claimants intend to submit claims pursuant to Articles 10.16.1(a)(i) (A), (B), and (C) of the CAFTA-DR.2 In particular:
2 In addition, Honduras Próspera may submit claims for monetary damages to arbitration before ICSID pursuant to Article 2.2 of the Legal Stability Agreement. ↩
[Page 6]
framework and subsequent conduct with respect to Próspera ZEDE that has been arbitrary, grossly unfair, unjust, idiosyncratic, and involves a lack of due process).
As the events are ongoing, these breaches are expected to continue and other further breaches may occur (e.g., if Honduras provides more favorable treatment to Hondurans with investments in ZEDEs than it does to US investors, or takes further damaging legislative, regulatory, or executive action vis-à-vis Próspera ZEDE or Claimants’ assets, executives or personnel), all of which would give rise to additional claims.
Honduras’ conduct has already resulted in significant harm to Claimants, including the loss of economic opportunity as well as negative impacts on financing, operations and reputation. Moreover, if, as can be reasonably assumed from Honduras’s conduct and silence in response to Claimants’ correspondence, it is Honduras’s position that Próspera ZEDE no longer validly exists, Claimants are entitled to compensation for the full value of their losses over the course of the remaining period of the guaranteed legal stability of the ZEDE legal framework with respect to Claimants and Próspera ZEDE. At this time, and depending on how Honduras chooses to proceed, Claimants anticipate that the approximate amount of damages will be at least several billion US dollars, and as high as US$ 10.775 billion, which according to the valuation of an expert firm experienced in the quantification of damages in investment treaty arbitrations represents the net present value of Claimants’ investment, plus appropriate interest and legal fees.
***
The Próspera Group is delivering this notice in accordance with the CAFTA-DR in order to safeguard its rights thereunder, but reiterates its commitment to seeking to resolve the dispute amicably. As noted in our prior letters, the CAFTA-DR requires the parties initially to seek to resolve the dispute through consultation and negotiations. The Próspera Group respectfully invites Honduras to use the 90 day waiting period for the commencement of arbitration that the present notice commences under the CAFTA-DR to seek a good faith resolution that makes it unnecessary for Claimants to submit claims to arbitration. In particular, Claimants invite Honduras to follow international best practices and enter into a mutual confidentiality, without prejudice and non-disclosure agreement, as a sign of mutual good faith, so that the parties can meet and engage in an open and frank dialogue, as is customary in the resolution of investment disputes.
According to Annex 10-G of the CAFTA-DR, notices and other documents must be served on Honduras by delivery to the Dirección General de Integración Económica y Política Comercial. We understand that
[Page 7]
the Dirección General de Integración Económica y Política Comercial has since become part of the Secretaría de Desarrollo Económico, which, among other things, was assigned the functions of Economic Integration, Investment and Foreign Trade in accordance with Executive Decree No. PCM-018-2014, published on June 6, 2014. This notice has been addressed accordingly.
Sincerely,
Signature
Ank Santens
Francisco X. Jijón
WHITE & CASE LLP
cc:
Secretaría de Estado de La Presidencia
Blvd. Juan Pablo II
Centro Cívico Gubernamental
Jose Cecilio del Valle, Torre #1, Piso #11
Tegucigalpa, Municipio del Distrito Central
Honduras, C.A.
Minister Pedro Barquero
Secretaría de Desarrollo Económico
Centro Cívico Gubernamental
Tegucigalpa, Municipio del Distrito Central
Honduras, C.A.
Minister Miguel Medina
Secretaría de Promoción de Inversiones
Centro Cívico Gubernamental
Tegucigalpa, Municipio del Distrito Central
Honduras, C.A.
Procurador General de la República
Abg. Manuel Antonio Diaz Galeas
Procuraduría General de la República
Residencial El Trapiche
Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Honduras, C.A.
Ambassador Laura F. Dogu
U.S. Embassy Tegucigalpa
Avenida La Paz
Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Honduras, C.A.