This HTML version is machine-generated. Always consult the original document.Original document (PDF), opens in new tab

Gabriel Resources Ltd. & Gabriel Resources (Jersey) Ltd. v. Romania

ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31

Tribunal's decisions dated 2 July 2018

CLAIMANTS' PRIVILEGE LOG

IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 55(3) OF PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 10

JUNE 18, 2018

[Page 1]

[Page 4]

[Page 6]

[Page 8]

[Page 10]

[Page 13]

[Page 23]

[Page 25]

[Page 29]

[Page 33]

[Page 36]

[Page 37]

[Page 39]

No. Document
Request
No(s)		 Date To From Subject matter Reason for Non-
Disclosure		 Respondent's
Comments		 Tribunal's
Decision
1 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
2 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To

[Page 2]

the extent that this document includes any non-privileged discussion of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal decision, and/or the decision confirming it in April 2012 finding the 2002 Roşia Montană Local Council decisions approving the PUZ and PUZ unlawful, the document should be produced

[Page 3]

with the privileged portion redacted.
3 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
4 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
5 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
6 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
7 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 5]

that this document is privileged.
8 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
9 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
10 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
11 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
12 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 7]

that this document is privileged.
13 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
14 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
15 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
16 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
17 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 9]

that this document is privileged.
18 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
19 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
20 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
21 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
22 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 11]

that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this document includes any non-privileged discussion of the NGO court challenges of September 2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be

[Page 12]

produced with the privileged portion redacted.
23 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document

[Page 14]

is privileged.
24 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
25 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
26 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of

[Page 15]

Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
27 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
28 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document

[Page 16]

is privileged.
29 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
30 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
31 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of

[Page 17]

Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
32 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this document includes any non-privileged discussion of (i) the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal

[Page 18]

decision, and/or the decision confirming it in April 2012 finding the 2002 Roşia Montană Local Council decisions approving the PUG and PUZ unlawful, or of (ii) the NGO court challenges of September 2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to

[Page 19]

Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
33 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this document includes any non-privileged discussion of (i) the Alba Iulia

[Page 20]

Court of Appeal decision, and/or the decision confirming it in April 2012 finding the 2002 Roşia Montană Local Council decisions approving the PUG and PUZ unlawful, or of (ii) the NGO court challenges of September 2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to

[Page 21]

Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
34 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this document includes any non-privileged discussion

[Page 22]

of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal decision, and/or the decision confirming it in April 2012 finding the 2002 Roşia Montană Local Council decisions approving the PUG and PUZ unlawful, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
35 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
36 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
37 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent

[Page 24]

’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
38 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
39 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
40 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
41 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
42 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 26]

that this document is privileged.
43 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
44 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this

[Page 27]

document includes any non-privileged discussion of (i) the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal decision, and/or the decision confirming it in April 2012 finding the 2002 Roşia Montană Local Council decisions approving the PUG and PUZ unlawful, or of (ii) the NGO court challenges of September

[Page 28]

2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
45 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
46 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
47 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
48 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 30]

that this document is privileged.
49 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
50 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this

[Page 31]

document includes any non-privileged discussion of (i) the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal decision, and/or the decision confirming it in April 2012 finding the 2002 Roşia Montană Local Council decisions approving the PUG and PUZ unlawful, or of (ii) the NGO court challenges of September

[Page 32]

2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
51 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
52 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
53 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
54 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 34]

that this document is privileged.
55 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
56 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this

[Page 35]

document includes any non-privileged discussion of the NGO court challenges of September 2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
57 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
58 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
59 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
60 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
61 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance

[Page 38]

that this document is privileged.
62 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
63 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged.
64 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this document includes any non-privileged discussion of the NGO court challenges of September 2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011

[Page 40]

relating to Cârnic and the related proceedings, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
65 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent’s acceptance that this document is privileged in part. To the extent that this document includes any non-privileged

[Page 41]

No. Document
Request
No(s)		 Date To From Subject matter Reason for Non-
Disclosure		 Respondent's
Comments		 Tribunal's
Decision
66 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] discussion of the NGO court challenges of September 2011 and January 2012 against ADC 9/2011 relating to Cârnic and the related proceeding s, the document should be produced with the privileged portion redacted.
[Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent 's

[Page 42]

No. Document
Request
No(s)		 Date To From Subject matter Reason for Non-
Disclosure		 Respondent's
Comments		 Tribunal's
Decision
67 [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] [Redacted] acceptance that this document is privileged.
[Redacted] [Redacted] The Tribunal takes note of Respondent 's acceptance that this document is privileged.