IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE
NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES
BETWEEN:
TENNANT ENERGY, LLC
Claimant
AND:
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA
Respondent
Witness Statement of Lucas McCall
September 21, 2020
Trade Law Bureau
Government of Canada
Lester B. Pearson Building
125 Sussex Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0G2
CANADA
[Page 1]
1. My name is Lucas McCall. I am a Deputy Director in the Asia Trade Policy and Negotiation Division at Global Affairs Canada (“GAC”).
2. From November 2010 until August 2017, I was with the Investment Trade Policy Division at GAC, serving as Trade Policy Officer from November 2010 to June 2013 and Senior Trade Policy Officer from June 2013 to August 2017. My responsibilities included providing trade policy advice on NAFTA Chapter Eleven cases, including the Mesa Power LLC v. Canada NAFTA Chapter Eleven arbitration (“Mesa arbitration”).
3. As part of my role working on the Mesa arbitration, I was tasked with ensuring that the GAC website page maintained for the purposes of the Mesa arbitration was up to date with all submissions filed in the arbitration. I can confirm that, as of May 8, 2013, the following submissions in the Mesa arbitration were publicly available on that website:
4. Attached as Exhibit R-030 is a true and correct copy of a version history screenshot of the Mesa arbitration page of the GAC website as of May 8, 2013.1
1 R-030, Global Affairs Canada, Mesa Group LLC v. Government of Canada, Webpage Screenshot, as of 8 May 2013, p. 1. ↩
[Page 2]
5. I can also confirm that, as of September 11, 2013, in addition to the documents listed in paragraph 3, the following documents were publicly available on the GAC website page maintained for the purposes of the Mesa arbitration:
6. Attached as Exhibit R-030 is a true and correct copy of a version history screenshot of the Mesa arbitration page of the GAC website as of September 11, 2013.2
7. From January 4, 2016 onward, GAC’s practice was not to post submissions from NAFTA Chapter Eleven proceedings on the GAC website. Instead, to ensure Canada’s transparency obligations under the NAFTA were met, GAC website pages maintained for NAFTA Chapter Eleven arbitrations directed visitors to the website of the relevant administering institution. As a result, from January 4, 2016 onward, the GAC webpage maintained for the Mesa arbitration directed visitors to the website of the Permanent Court of Arbitration.3
Dated: September 21, 2020
Signature
Lucas McCall
2 R-030, Global Affairs Canada, Mesa Group LLC v. Government of Canada, Webpage Screenshot, as of 11 September 2013, p. 2. ↩
3 Global Affairs Canada, Mesa Group LLC v. Government of Canada Webpage, available at: https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/mesa.aspx?lang=eng [Accessed on September 21, 2020]. ↩