[Page 1]
| SVEA COURT OF APPEAL | MINUTES | Court exhibit 14 |
| Division 02 | 2019-04-23 | Case no T 4236-19 |
| Section 020113 | Presentation in | |
| Stockholm |
In-house translation from Swedish
Judges of Appeal Kazimir Åberg and Carin Häckter, reporting judge, and Acting Associate Judge Carl Johan Sundqvist
Legal Clerk Vanja Eriksson
Claimant
Italian Republic
Avvocatura Generale Dello Stato
Via dei Portoghesi, 12
Rom 00186
Italy
Counsel: Advokat James Hope, advokat Mattias Rosengren and advokat Cecilia Möller
Norsted
Advokatfirman Vinge KB
Box 1703
111 87 Stockholm
Defendant
CEF Energia B.V., RSIN 821442430
Hoogoorddreef 15
1101 BA Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Challenge and invalidity of an arbitral award; now question of stay of execution
[1] On 16 January 2019, an arbitral award was rendered between CEF Energia B.V. (CEF Energia) and the Italian Republic.
[2] The Italian Republic has brought an action against CEF Energia and requested that the Court of Appeal should set aside or, alternatively, declare the award invalid in parts or in its entirety. The Italian Republic has also requested that the Court of Appeal, without affording CEF Energia an opportunity to submit a response, should order that enforcement of the award may not take place until further notice (stay of execution).
Dok. Id 1496477
| Postal address | Visiting address | Telephone | Telefax | Office hours |
| Box 2290 | Birger Jarls Torg 16 | 08-561 670 00 | 08-21 93 27 | Monday - Friday |
| 103 17 Stockholm | 08-561 675 00 | 09:00-16:30 | ||
| E-mail: [email protected] | ||||
| www.svea.se |
[Page 2]
Following a presentation of the case, the Court of Appeal delivers the following
DECISION (to be delivered on 2019-04-24)
[3] The Court of Appeal orders that enforcement of the arbitral award rendered between the parties in Stockholm on 16 January 2019, SCC case no. V 2015/158, may not take place until further notice.
The reasons for the decision
[4] Pursuant to Chapter 3, Section 18 of the Enforcement Code, an arbitral award may be enforced as a judgment that has entered into final legal force, unless otherwise ordered by the Court where the action against the arbitral award is pending. The Court of Appeal finds reasons to now order stay of execution of the award until further notice.
[5] This decision may not be appealed (Section 43, paragraph 2 of the Swedish Arbitration Act [1999:116]).
Vanja Eriksson
Minutes presented /