INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES
Silver Bull Resources, Inc.
v.
United Mexican States
(ICSID Case No. ARB/23/24)
Members of the Tribunal
Mr. Ian Glick KC, President of the Tribunal
Mr. Stephen L. Drymer, Arbitrator
Prof. Philippe Sands KC, Arbitrator
Secretary of the Tribunal
Ms. Celeste E. Salinas Quero
11 March 2024
[Page 1]
1. According to the NAFTA Free Trade Commission Note of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions of 31 July 2001 (the “Note”), “the NAFTA Parties agree that nothing in the relevant arbitral rules imposes a general duty of confidentiality or precludes the Parties from providing public access to documents submitted to, or issued by, Chapter Eleven tribunals [...].”
2. The Note further establishes that, in the application of the foregoing, the NAFTA Parties agree that documents submitted to, or issued by, a Chapter Eleven tribunal will be made available to the public subject to the redaction of (i) confidential business information; (ii) information which is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under the relevant domestic law; and (iii) information which must be withheld pursuant to the relevant arbitral rules.
3. In light of the above, on January 17, 2024, the Tribunal circulated a draft of this Procedural Order to the Parties.
4. On February 13, 2024, the first session was held. During the first session, the Parties and the Tribunal discussed the Parties' comments on Draft Procedural Order No. 2 and the Draft Procedural Order No. 1.
5. This Procedural Order No. 2 contains the Parties' agreements and the Tribunal's decisions concerning the transparency regime governing this case.
6. This Confidentiality Order shall apply to the following documents (the “Covered Documents”):
[Page 2]
7. This Order governs issues relating to the disclosure of information to the public and is without prejudice to the Parties' right to object to the production of documents on grounds of confidentiality.
8. Confidential information is information which is protected because:
[Page 3]
8. A Party claiming that a Covered Document contains confidential information shall notify the other Party and ICSID within fifteen (15) days of its filing or issuance, as the case may be, that it contains confidential information and shall provide its redacted version to the other Party within thirty (30) days thereafter. The ICSID Secretariat shall not publish any Covered Document on its website until the initial fifteen-day period has expired, and no declaration of confidentiality has been made by either Party, or the proposed redactions have been agreed or resolved in the manner provided below at paragraph 9.
9. Disputes related to a Party’s designation of Confidential Information may be submitted to the Tribunal for determination, pursuant to the following procedure:
[Page 4]
10. The Parties agree that in the event of a dispute regarding proposed redactions to the Award, the power to decide shall reside with the former Members of the Tribunal, even if such Tribunal is at that time functus officio.
11. The Members of the Tribunal will be compensated for time spent in the resolution of any disputes in connection with redaction of “confidential information" in the Award in accordance with Section 3 of Procedural Order No. 1, with their claims being paid from the case fund administered by ICSID for this proceeding pursuant to ICSID Administrative and Financial Regulations.
12. Without prejudice to the Respondent’s obligations under Article 1127 of the NAFTA and Section A.2 of the Note, the Parties agree that ICSID shall act as repository of published information.
13. The following rules shall apply in connection with the Repository:
[Page 5]
14. Hearings shall be closed to the public. However, provisions shall be made for representatives of the other NAFTA Parties to attend the hearing upon request.
On behalf of the Tribunal,
Signature
Ian Glick KC
President of the Tribunal
Date: 11 March 2024
[Page 6]
| [insert Party] | Request [1] |
| Information sought to be protected from disclosure |
|
| Legal basis for protection |
|
| Comments | |
| Reply by opposing Party |
|
| Decision |