Participant Type:
Law Firm
Involved in 2 cases (2 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 10 case documents on record
Claimant's Law Firm 1 case in this role
- G.I.H.G. Limited, Natland Group Limited, Natland Investment Group NV, and Radiance Energy Holding S.A.R.L. v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2013-35 View case details
3 source documents
- G.I.H.G. Limited, Natland Group Limited, Natland Investment Group NV, and Radiance Energy Holding S.A.R.L. v. Czech Republic, Decision on the Achmea Objection
- G.I.H.G. Limited, Natland Group Limited, Natland Investment Group NV, and Radiance Energy Holding S.A.R.L. v. Czech Republic, Final Award
- G.I.H.G. Limited, Natland Group Limited, Natland Investment Group NV, and Radiance Energy Holding S.A.R.L. v. Czech Republic, Partial Award
Respondent's Law Firm 1 case in this role
- Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, SCC Case No. V 2015/092 View case details
5 source documents
- Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, Final Award (Redacted)
- Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, Final Award (Unredacted)
- Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding Respondent's Request for Time Extension to Submit its Rejoinder on the Merits and Reply on Jurisdiction
- Littop and others v. Ukraine, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding Respondent's Request for Time Extension to Submit Statement of Defence
- Littop and others v. Ukraine, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding the Hearing