Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Oxus Gold v. Republic of Uzbekistan, Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Gretton's Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award

6 Feb 2019
Oxus Gold v. Republic of Uzbekistan, UNCITRAL
View case details
Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Gretton's Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Gretton's Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
James E. Boasberg
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the District of Columbia on Gretton's Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.