Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Vodafone v. India, UNCITRAL (Dutch BIT claim), Judgment of the High Court of Delhi Restraining the Claimant from Proceeding with Its Arbitration Claim

22 Aug 2017
Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Government of India [I], PCA Case No. 2016-35 (Dutch BIT Claim)
View case details
Judgment of the High Court of Delhi Restraining the Claimant from Proceeding with Its Arbitration Claim
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the High Court of Delhi Restraining the Claimant from Proceeding with Its Arbitration Claim
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the High Court of Delhi Restraining the Claimant from Proceeding with Its Arbitration Claim
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.