Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Telefónica v. Colombia, Respondent the Republic of Colombia's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative to Stay the Proceedings, September 8, 2026

8 Sep 2026
Telefónica, S.A. v. Republic of Colombia, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/3
Colombia’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Colombia’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Colombia’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This memorandum of points and authorities is submitted by the Republic of Colombia in support of its motion to dismiss the enforcement petition filed by Telefónica, S.A. under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), or alternatively, to stay the proceedings pending the resolution of an ongoing ICSID annulment proceeding.

Colombia asserts that the District Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction under the FSIA because neither the arbitration exception (28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(6)) nor the implied-waiver exception applies. Colombia argues that it never consented to arbitrate the underlying contract dispute under the Colombia-Spain Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), as the dispute arose exclusively under domestic concession contracts containing mandatory domestic commercial arbitration clauses. In the alternative, Colombia requests a stay of proceedings pending the decision of the ICSID ad hoc Annulment Committee, arguing that judicial economy, the balance of hardships, and international comity favor deferring enforcement until the validity of the underlying award is conclusively resolved.