Covington & Burling

Participant Type: 

Law Firm

Involved in 16 cases (14 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Investment Protection Disputes · 1 Foreign Investment Law (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 87 case documents on record

Claimant's Law Firm 11 cases in this role

• Accession Mezzanine Capital L.P. and Danubius Kereskedöház Vagyonkezelö Zrt. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/3 View case details
  1 source document

  • Accession Mezzanine Capital L.P. and Danubius Kereskedöház Vagyonkezelö Zrt. v. Hungary, Award
• Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2 View case details
  51 source documents

  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Reply Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Hedwig A. Lindner López
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Chamber of Commerce
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Internet Policy & Public Interest Clinic and Centre for Intellectual Property Policy
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Dr. Burcu Kilic, Professor Brook K. Baker, Professor Cynthia Ho and Mr. Yaniv Heled
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of Intellectual Property Law Professors
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Amicus Curiae submission of National Association of Manufacturers
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by CIPPIC (Univ of Ottawa) and CIPP (McGill Univ)
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Canadian Chamber of Commerce
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Dr. Grosse Ruse-Khan and Dr. Liddell and Dr. Waibel of Univ of Cambridge
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Five Intellectual Property Law Scholars
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by PhRMA and AMIIF and BIO
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by Seven Intellectual Property Law Professors
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant's Opposition to Canada's Jurisdictional Objection
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Reply Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Claimant’s Reply on the Merits
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Expert Report of Ronald E. Dimock
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Final Award
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 1
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 2
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 3
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 4
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 5
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 6
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 7
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits – Transcript, Day 8
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United Mexican States
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United States of America
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, NAFTA Article 1128 Supplemental Submission of United States of America
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Observations on Amicus Submissions
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Post-Hearing Brief
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Post-Hearing Brief – Annex A
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of T. David Reed
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbroo
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, Second Witness Statement of Michael Gillen
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submission Submitted by National Association of Manufacturers
  • Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada,Claimant’s Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions and Amicus Submission
  • Procedural Order No. 4
• JSC DTEK Krymenergo v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. 2018-41 View case details
  4 source documents

  • DTEK v. Russia, Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Feb 13, 2026
  • JSC DTEK Krymenergo v. Russian Federation, Judgment of the UK High Court
  • JSC DTEK Krymenergo v. Russian Federation, Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss
  • italaw180925 - DTEK v. Russia, Judgment of the District Court of Amsterdam, May 18, 2026 (Dutch)
• Legacy Vulcan LLC v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB/19/1 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Legacy Vulcan LLC v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Legacy Vulcan LLC v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Legacy Vulcan LLC v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Legacy Vulcan and Calizas Industriales del Carmen (Calica) v. United Mexican States, Notice of Intent
  • Legacy Vulcan v. Mexico, Award, July 27, 2026
• Newmont USA Limited and Newmont (Uzbekistan) Limited v. Republic of Uzbekistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/20 View case details
  1 source document

  • Newmont USA Limited and Newmont (Uzbekistan) Limited v. Republic of Uzbekistan, Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding
• Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11 View case details
  1 source document

  • Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, Decision on Annulment of the Award
• Rinat Akhmetov (Ukraine) v. Russian Federation (II), PCA Case No. 2025-02 View case details
  1 source document

  • Rinat Akhmetov (Ukraine) v. Russian Federation (II), Commencement of Proceeding
• Tidewater Inc., Tidewater Investment SRL, Tidewater Caribe, C.A., et al. v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/5 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Tidewater Inc., Tidewater Investment SRL, Tidewater Caribe, C.A., et al. v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Stay
  • Tidewater Investment SRL and Tidewater Caribe, C.A. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Application for Revision
• Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber Colombia, S.AS.​ v. Colombia View case details
  1 source document

  • Uber Technologies, Inc. and Uber Colombia, S.AS.​ v. Colombia, Notice of Dispute
• Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino S.L. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/11 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino S.L. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Award
  • Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino S.L. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Claimants' Press Release on the Award Rendered by the Tribunal on July 25, 2017
  • Valores Mundiales, S.L. and Consorcio Andino S.L. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on the Request for a Continuation of the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
• Venezuela Holdings, B.V., et al (case formerly known as Mobil Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, B.V., et al.) v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Mobil Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, B.V., Mobil Cerro Negro Holding, Ltd., Mobil Venezolana de Petróleos Holdings, Inc., Mobil Cerro Negro, Ltd., and Mobil Venezolana de Petróleos, Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Revision
  • Venezuela Holdings B.V. and others v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Procedural Order Concerning Questions of Procedure Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 20 (not public)
  • Venezuela Holdings, B.V., et al (case formerly known as Mobil Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, B.V., et al.) v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Annulment

Respondent's Law Firm 1 case in this role

• Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, PCA Case No. 2024-03 View case details
  6 source documents

  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Notice of Arbitration
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, PCA Press Release (I)
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Belaruskali JSC v. Lithuania, Procedural Order No. 5

Law Firm (side unconfirmed) 4 cases in this role

• Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/11/2 View case details
  1 source document

  • Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Venezuela, DPSVA, PDV Holdin and CITGO’s Opposed Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal
• LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E International, Inc .v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1 View case details
  3 source documents

  • LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E International, Inc .v. Argentine Republic, Award
  • LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E International, Inc .v. Argentine Republic, Decision on Liability
  • LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E International, Inc .v. Argentine Republic, Procedural Order Taking Note of the Discontinuance of the Proceeding
• Phoenix Action, Ltd. v. The Czech Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/5, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/5 View case details
  1 source document

  • Phoenix Action, Ltd. v. The Czech Republic, Award
• Stabil LLC and Others v. Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no. 2015-35 View case details
  1 source document

  • Stabil and others v. Russia, Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Feb 13, 2026