Participant Type:
Law Firm
Involved in 2 cases (2 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 10 case documents on record
Respondent's Law Firm 2 cases in this role
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/15 View case details
6 source documents
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Award
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on Annulment
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on Stay of Enforcement of the Award
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on the Applicant's Application for Provisional Measures
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on the Applicant's Application for Provisional Measures to Exclude Consideration of the Merits in Part I
- Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on the Applicant's Urgent Application for Provisional Measures Regarding the Temporary Stay
- Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited, and Hangani Development Co. (Private) Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/25 View case details
4 source documents
- Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited, and Hangani Development Co. (Private) Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on Stay of Enforcement of the Award
- Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited, and Hangani Development Co. (Private) Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on the Applicant's Urgent Application for Provisional Measures Regarding the Temporary Stay
- Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited, and Hangani Development Co. Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on the Applicant's Application for Provisional Measures
- Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited, and Hangani Development Co. Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Decision on the Applicant's Application for Provisional Measures to Exclude Consideration of the Merits in Part I