Petr Polasek

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 6 cases (6 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 14 case documents on record

Counsel (Claimant side) 3 cases in this role

• Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/15/31 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Award of the Tribunal
  • Gabriel Resources Ltd. and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v. Romania, Horacio A. Grigera Naon's Note of Dissent
• Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (I), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/09/1 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Export Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA
  • Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Award
• TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/23 View case details
  5 source documents

  • TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala, Award
  • TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala, Claimant's Reply (Resubmission Proceeding)
  • TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala, Claimants' Memorial
  • TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala, Decision on Annulment
  • TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala, Guatemala's Counter-Memorial (Resubmission Proceeding)

Counsel (Respondent side) 3 cases in this role

• ACF Renewable Energy v. Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/1 View case details
  3 source documents

  • ACF Renewable Energy v. Bulgaria, Award
  • ACF Renewable Energy v. Bulgaria, Decision on the Achmea Preliminary Objection
  • ACF Renewable Energy v. Bulgaria, Request for Arbitration
• Nexo & Mirastar v. Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/24/2 View case details
  1 source document

  • Nexo & Mirastar v. Bulgaria, Procedural Order No. 1
• The Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru [I], ICSID Case No. UNCT/13/1 View case details
  1 source document

  • The Renco Group, Inc. v. The Republic of Peru, Tribunal’s Decision regarding Respondent’s Request for Relief