Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Divine Inspiration (DIGOIL) v. DRC, Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award, April 30, 2020

30 Apr 2020
Divine Inspiration Group (PTY) Ltd v. Democratic Republic of Congo, ICC Case No. 22370/DDA
Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award filed by DIGOIL against the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The petition seeks the recognition and enforcement of a $619,270,111.62 arbitral award rendered on November 7, 2018, in ICC Arbitration No. 22370/DDA, pursuant to the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

Legal Issues and Positions

The petitioner asserts that the District Court possesses subject-matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). DIGOIL argues that the DRC explicitly waived its sovereign immunity from jurisdiction in the underlying 2007 and 2008 production-sharing agreements, and implicitly waived immunity by becoming a signatory to the New York Convention. The petitioner contends that the underlying dispute—arising from the DRC's failure to issue a requisite presidential order and its unlawful reallocation of exploration rights—is commercial in nature and falls squarely within the scope of the FAA and the New York Convention.

Relief Sought

DIGOIL requests that the Court enter an order confirming the arbitral award and entering judgment in its favor against the DRC. The requested judgment includes the principal damages and costs totaling $619,270,111.62, alongside post-award interest calculated at the rate of return of 20-year U.S. Treasury bonds plus 2%, accruing from the date of the award until full payment is executed.