Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Lupaka v. Peru, Notice of Settlement by Lupaka Gold Corp., August 07, 2026

7 Aug 2026
Lupaka Gold Corp. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/20/46
View case details
Notice of Settlement by Lupaka Gold
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Notice of Settlement by Lupaka Gold
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Robert K. Kry, Jackson A. Myers
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
MoloLamken, Lupaka Gold Corp, Peru
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Notice of Settlement by Lupaka Gold
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a Notice of Settlement filed by the plaintiff in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, concerning proceedings to recognize and enforce an arbitral award issued by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) against the Republic of Peru.

The plaintiff notified the court that the parties have successfully reached an agreement on payment terms intended to fully resolve the underlying dispute by December 31, 2026. In light of this agreement, the plaintiff requested that the court hold the proceedings in abeyance and take no further action pending the respondent State's compliance with the agreed-upon payment obligations. The plaintiff further indicated its intention to file a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice upon the respondent's full satisfaction of the settlement terms, while reserving the right to notify the court should circumstances require further judicial intervention.