Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

SAUR v. Argentina, Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award, April 23, 2026

23 Apr 2026
SAUR International SA v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/4
View case details
Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Matthew S. Rozen, Nicholas A. Mecsas-Faxon, Courtney Stone Mirski
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
SAUR International SA, King & Spalding, Argentina
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Petition to Enforce Arbitral Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Petition to Enforce an Arbitral Award filed by SAUR International S.A.S. against the Republic of Argentina in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The petition seeks the recognition and enforcement of a final arbitral award rendered on May 22, 2014, in ICSID Case No. ARB/04/4, pursuant to the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (the ICSID Convention) and 22 U.S.C. § 1650a.

Legal Basis and Relief Sought

The petitioner asserts that the District Court possesses subject-matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1330(a), arguing that Argentina waived its sovereign immunity by becoming a contracting party to the ICSID Convention and by consenting to arbitration under the France-Argentina Bilateral Investment Treaty. The petition emphasizes that under Article 54 of the ICSID Convention and corresponding U.S. implementing legislation, ICSID awards are not subject to collateral attack or substantive review by domestic courts, and must be accorded the same full faith and credit as a final judgment of a state court.

Accordingly, the petitioner requests the entry of an order enforcing the arbitral award and a judgment in its favor for the principal sum of $39,990,111, alongside accrued pre-award and post-award interest, as well as arbitration costs and fees totaling $686,500 and €1,486,975, converted to U.S. dollars.