Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Ghana Power Generation Company v. Republic of Ghana, PCA Case No. 2019-05

6 Aug 2024
Ghana Power Generation Company v. Republic of Ghana, PCA Case No. 2019-05
View case details
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
James E. Boasberg
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Ghana, Ghana Power Generation Company
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is an Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, presided over by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg, in the proceedings between GPGC Limited and the Government of the Republic of Ghana. The Order formally resolves the Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment following the Respondent State's failure to appear or adequately defend the action.

Decision and Operative Relief

Relying upon the reasoning set forth in a concurrently issued Memorandum Opinion, the Court granted the Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment. As a result of this dispositive ruling, the Court awarded the Petitioner the principal sum of $111,493,828.92. Additionally, the Court mandated that post-judgment interest shall accrue on the awarded sum in strict accordance with the federal statutory framework provided under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.