Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

GPGC v. Ghana, Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, September 23, 2024

23 Sep 2024
Ghana Power Generation Company v. Republic of Ghana, PCA Case No. 2019-05
View case details
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
James E. Boasberg
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Ghana Power Generation Company, Ghana
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is an Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia regarding a Motion for Fees filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent, the Government of the Republic of Ghana.

The Court, referencing the reasoning set forth in an accompanying Memorandum Opinion, ruled on the allocation of legal fees and costs arising from the enforcement proceedings. The principal procedural issue addressed was the quantification and entitlement of the Petitioner to recover its incurred legal expenses.

In its dispositive ruling, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Petitioner’s Motion for Fees. Consequently, the Court entered a final judgment in favor of the Petitioner and against the Respondent, awarding fees and costs in the quantified amount of $124,744.