Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Yukos Capital v. Russia, Request for Entry of Default, September 6, 2022

6 Sep 2022
Yukos Capital Limited (formerly Yukos Capital SARL) v. Russian Federation, UNCITRAL (Geneva Tribunal), PCA Case No. 2013-31
View case details
Request for Entry of Default
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Request for Entry of Default
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Robert L. Weigel, Jason W. Myatt, Matthew S. Rozen
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Yukos Capital Limited, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Russia
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Request for Entry of Default
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a Request for Entry of Default filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent, the Russian Federation, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), the Petitioner formally requested that the Clerk of the Court enter a default against the Respondent. The procedural basis for this application was the Russian Federation's failure to plead or otherwise defend against the underlying action. The filing notes that a supporting declaration was submitted contemporaneously to substantiate the Respondent's procedural default and justify the requested relief.