Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

DP World and Doraleh v. Djibouti, Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, July 23, 2024

23 Jul 2024
DP World Djibouti FZCO and Doraleh Container Terminal SA v. Republic of Djibouti (II), LCIA Case No. 183886
View case details
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Zia M. Faruqui
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Djibouti, DP World Djibouti FZCO, Doraleh Container Terminal SA
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is an Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, adopting a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to confirm a foreign arbitral award in the enforcement proceedings between DP World Djibouti FZCO and the Republic of Djibouti.

The procedural posture centers on the Magistrate Judge's earlier Report and Recommendation, issued on July 5, 2024, which advised the parties of their right to file written objections within fourteen days pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3(b). The Court noted that failure to file timely objections could result in a waiver of the right to appeal an order adopting the findings. Upon reviewing the docket, the District Court observed that the fourteen-day statutory deadline had lapsed without any objections being filed by either party.

In the absence of any objections, the District Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Consequently, the Court issued a dispositive ruling granting the Petitioner's Petition to Confirm the Foreign Arbitration Award.