Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

LSG and others v. Romania, Request for Arbitration, May 23, 2018

23 May 2018
LSG Building Solutions GmbH and others v. Romania, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/19
Request for Arbitration
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Request for Arbitration
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Request for Arbitration
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Request for Arbitration submitted to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) by a consortium of ten corporate investors against Romania. The Claimants initiated the proceeding pursuant to the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) and the ICSID Convention, seeking the constitution of a three-member arbitral tribunal to adjudicate their claims.

Factual and Legal Background

The dispute arises from Romania’s alleged dismantling of its renewable energy incentive framework. To meet European Union renewable energy targets, Romania implemented a Green Certificate (GC) support scheme designed to attract foreign investment in the photovoltaic (PV) sector. The Claimants assert that they made substantial investments in Romanian PV facilities in direct reliance on the promised stability of this regulatory regime.

According to the Request, Romania subsequently enacted a series of legislative and regulatory measures that fundamentally altered the GC framework. These measures allegedly deferred the issuance of GCs, drastically reduced mandatory acquisition quotas for energy suppliers, and artificially depressed the GC trading market. The Claimants argue that these actions created an oversupply of unsold certificates, thereby destroying the economic viability of their investments.

Claims and Requested Relief

The Claimants contend that Romania’s actions constitute multiple breaches of Part III of the ECT, specifically alleging violations of the fair and equitable treatment standard, the guarantee of constant protection and security, and the prohibition against unlawful expropriation. The Claimants seek declaratory relief affirming the tribunal's jurisdiction and Romania's liability, alongside full compensation for all damages suffered, pre- and post-award compound interest, and the costs of the arbitration.