Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

IC Power and Kenon Holdings v. Peru, Complaint

14 Nov 2023
IC Power Ltd and Kenon Holdings Ltd v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/19/19
Complaint
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Complaint
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Complaint
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Complaint filed by IC Power Ltd and Kenon Holdings Ltd (Plaintiffs) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Plaintiffs seek the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award rendered against the Republic of Peru on October 3, 2023, in ICSID Case No. ARB/19/19, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 1650a and Article 54 of the ICSID Convention.

Background and Underlying Award

The underlying arbitration was conducted pursuant to the Free Trade Agreement between Peru and Singapore. The dispute arose from regulatory measures implemented by Peru's mining and energy regulator, OSINERGMIN, which unilaterally modified the rights of Plaintiffs' Peruvian subsidiary regarding the provision of secondary frequency regulation services. The ICSID tribunal found that Peru abruptly repudiated the legal framework it had devised, rendering its actions "seriously arbitrary" and constituting a breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard under Article 10.5 of the Treaty. Consequently, the tribunal awarded Plaintiffs $110.7 million in damages, alongside pre- and post-award interest and costs.

Relief Sought

In the present action, Plaintiffs invoke the court's subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), noting Peru's waiver of sovereign immunity by signing the ICSID Convention. Plaintiffs request that the court enter an order recognizing the ICSID award as binding and enforce the pecuniary obligations imposed therein as if it were a final judgment of a court of general jurisdiction of one of the several States. The Complaint notes that while a request for supplementation/rectification regarding the interest calculation remains pending before ICSID, such a request does not stay enforcement of the Award.