Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Telefónica v. Colombia, Petition to Recognize and Enforce a Foreign Arbitral Award

2 Jun 2026
Telefónica, S.A. v. Republic of Colombia, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/3
View case details
Petition to Recognize and Enforce a Foreign Arbitral Award
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Petition to Recognize and Enforce a Foreign Arbitral Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Horacio A. Grigera Naón
Respondent appointee
Yves Derains
Tribunal/Panel chair
José Emilio Nunes Pinto
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Nicolle E. Kownacki, Sofya Cherkasova
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
undefined
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Petition to Recognize and Enforce a Foreign Arbitral Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture and Relief Sought

This document is a petition filed by Telefónica S.A. before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award rendered under the auspices of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The petition is brought against the Republic of Colombia pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 1650a and Article 54 of the ICSID Convention. Telefónica requests that the Court confirm the award and enter a final judgment against Colombia for the pecuniary obligations imposed therein, including principal damages, interest, and legal costs.

Background of the Underlying Arbitration

The dispute originated from measures taken by Colombia that affected Telefónica's investment in the Colombian telecommunications sector through its subsidiary, ColTel. At the time of investment, Colombian law stipulated that upon the expiration of telecommunications concession contracts, only the radioelectric spectrum would revert to the State. However, a 2013 judgment by the Colombian Constitutional Court (C-555 Judgment) retroactively altered this legal framework, mandating the reversion of all concession-related assets for contracts signed before 1998. This led to a domestic arbitration where ColTel was ordered to pay approximately US$547 million. Telefónica was compelled to capitalize ColTel to satisfy this domestic award, disbursing US$379,804,275.55, corresponding to its ownership interest.

The ICSID Tribunal's Award

Telefónica initiated ICSID arbitration, alleging that Colombia's measures violated the Spain-Colombia Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT). On November 12, 2024, the arbitral tribunal unanimously found in favor of Telefónica. The tribunal rejected Colombia's jurisdictional objections and held on the merits that Colombia had breached its obligation to provide fair and equitable treatment (FET) under Article 2(3) of the BIT. The tribunal reasoned that the C-555 Judgment and subsequent state actions constituted a drastic modification of the regulatory framework, frustrating Telefónica's legitimate expectations based on 15 years of consistent state practice. The tribunal awarded Telefónica US$379,804,275.55 in principal compensation, plus 5% compound annual interest from August 29, 2017, and €4,300,824.32 for legal fees, plus 4.25% compound annual interest from the date of the award.

Status of Annulment and Enforcement

Following the award, Colombia initiated annulment proceedings before an ICSID ad hoc committee. The committee granted a provisional stay of enforcement, conditioned upon Colombia providing an irrevocable bank guarantee for the full amount of the award. Colombia failed to provide the guarantee within the prescribed deadlines, resulting in the automatic lifting of the stay of enforcement on April 4, 2026. The petition asserts that, under Article 53(1) of the ICSID Convention, the award is final and binding. Citing U.S. case law, the petitioner argues that the pendency of annulment proceedings does not impede enforcement where the stay has been lifted, and the award is entitled to full faith and credit as a final judgment of a U.S. court.