Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Request for Arbitration

1 May 2020
Espíritu Santo Holdings, LP and L1bre Holding, LLC v. United Mexican States (I), ICSID Case No. ARB/20/13
Document provided by: Investor-State LawGuide
Request for Arbitration
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Request for Arbitration
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Request for Arbitration
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

The document is a Request for Arbitration filed by Espíritu Santo Holdings, LP ("Claimant"), a Canadian entity, against the United Mexican States ("Mexico") before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The claim is brought pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The dispute concerns Claimant's investment in a concession granted to its Mexican subsidiary, Servicios Digitales Lusad, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("Lusad"), to install and operate a proprietary digital taximeter and mobile hailing application system for all registered taxis in Mexico City. Claimant alleges that following a change in the municipal government of Mexico City, Mexico engaged in a series of unilateral, arbitrary, and politically motivated measures that destroyed its investment. Claimant's principal contentions are that Mexico, through the actions of the Mexico City government, first unlawfully suspended the installation of the system, then permanently suspended the concession, and ultimately terminated it without due process. Claimant further alleges that Mexico misappropriated Lusad's technology and business concept by developing and launching a state-run replacement application, "Mi Taxi," which offered substantially the same services. Claimant asserts that these actions constitute an unlawful indirect expropriation without compensation in breach of NAFTA Article 1110, a denial of fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security in breach of NAFTA Article 1105, and discriminatory treatment in breach of the national treatment standard under NAFTA Article 1102. As relief, Claimant requests the Tribunal to declare that Mexico has breached its NAFTA obligations, order Mexico to pay compensation for all resulting losses, estimated to be in the billions of U.S. dollars, plus interest, and award all costs of the arbitration.