Guglielmo Verdirame

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 8 cases (8 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 23 case documents on record

Counsel (Claimant side) 4 cases in this role

• ArcelorMittal S.A. v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/34 View case details
  1 source document

  • ArcelorMittal S.A. v. Italian Republic, Registration of the Request for Arbitration
• Diag Human SE and Mr. Josef Stava v. Czech Republic, PCA Case No. 2018-20 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Diag Human SE and Mr. Josef Stava v. Czech Republic, Judgment of the UK Court of Appeal
  • Diag Human SE and Mr. Josef Stava v. Czech Republic, Judgment of the UK High Court of Justice
• Oleg Deripaska v. Republic of Montenegro, PCA Case No. 2017-07 View case details
  1 source document

  • Oleg Deripaska v. Republic of Montenegro, Final Award
• ČEZ, a.s. v. Republic of Bulgaria, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/24 View case details
  2 source documents

  • ČEZ, a.s. v. Republic of Bulgaria, Decision on Jurisdiction
  • ČEZ, a.s. v. Republic of Bulgaria, Decision on the Non-Disputing Party's Application to File a Written Submission Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 37(2)

Counsel (Respondent side) 4 cases in this role

• Iskandar Safa and Akram Safa v. Hellenic Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/20 View case details
  1 source document

  • Iskandar Safa and Akram Safa v. Hellenic Republic, Award (redacted)
• Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, SCC Case No. V 2015/092 View case details
  5 source documents

  • Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, Final Award (Redacted)
  • Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, Final Award (Unredacted)
  • Littop Enterprises Limited, Bridgemont Ventures Limited and Bordo Management Limited v. Ukraine, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding Respondent's Request for Time Extension to Submit its Rejoinder on the Merits and Reply on Jurisdiction
  • Littop and others v. Ukraine, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding Respondent's Request for Time Extension to Submit Statement of Defence
  • Littop and others v. Ukraine, Letter from the Tribunal Regarding the Hearing
• Türkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortaklığı v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/2 View case details
  1 source document

  • Türkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortaklığı v. Republic of Kazakhstan, Award Embodying the Parties' Settlement Agreement Pursuant to ICSID Arbitration Rule 43(2)
•  Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/29 View case details
  10 source documents

  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Decision on Application for Annulment
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Award of the Tribunal
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 6
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 7
  • Cortec Mining Kenya Limited, Cortec (Pty) Limited and Stirling Capital Limited v. Republic of Kenya, Procedural Order No. 8