Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania, Romania’s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay the Enforcement Proceedings

11 Jan 2019
Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania [I], ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20
View case details
Romania’s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay the Enforcement Proceedings
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Romania’s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay the Enforcement Proceedings
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Ioana Salajanu
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Romania’s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay the Enforcement Proceedings
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.