Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Khaitan Holdings Mauritius Limited v. India, Judgment of the High Court of Delhi on India’s Request for an Injunction to Stay the Arbitration Proceedings

29 Jan 2019
Khaitan Holdings (Mauritius) Limited v. Republic of India, PCA Case No 2018-50
View case details
Judgment of the High Court of Delhi on India’s Request for an Injunction to Stay the Arbitration Proceedings
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the High Court of Delhi on India’s Request for an Injunction to Stay the Arbitration Proceedings
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Francis Xavier
Respondent appointee
Brigitte Stern
Tribunal/Panel chair
Campbell A. McLachlan
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Prathiba M. Singh
Claimant's counsel
James Lloyd Loftis, Alexander Slade, Harriet Foster, Mark J. Beeley, Sarah Stockley, Vinson & Elkins, Dayan Krishnan, Misha Rohatgi Mohta
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Piyush Joshi, Anuradha RV, Sumiti Yadava, Lalia Philip, Prithvirat Chauhan, Clarus Law Associates, Yuvraj Samant, Law Care Legal Consultants, Benard V. Preziosi, Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle, Sanjay Jain SA, Additional Solicitor General of India
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the High Court of Delhi on India’s Request for an Injunction to Stay the Arbitration Proceedings
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.