Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw portal. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

UAB E energija (Lithuania) v. Republic of Latvia, Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator August Reinisch

22 Dec 2017
UAB E energija (Lithuania) v. Republic of Latvia, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/33
Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator August Reinisch
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator August Reinisch
Participants listed are for this document only, and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator August Reinisch
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.